Volume 7, number 1
 Views: (Visited 90 times, 1 visits today)    PDF Downloads: 950

Mustafa S, Khan A, Effect of Systemic Pesticide on Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Cultivar Red Delicious. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2010;7(1)
Manuscript received on : January 28, 2010
Manuscript accepted on : April 15, 2010
Published online on:  --
How to Cite    |   Publication History    |   PlumX Article Matrix

Effect of Systemic Pesticide on Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Cultivar Red Delicious

Shabeena Mustafa and Amina Khan

ABSTRACT: The present study is carried out to assess the effect of systemic pesticide triadimefon (WP) on physico-chemical features of cultivar Red delicious. The different parameters studied were pedicle, fruit length, width, length : width, total soluble solids (TSS), yield efficiency and average fruit yield. The treatment is applied at fruit development stage with different treatment concentrations ranging from 0. 00 to 0. 09% designed as control (0.00), T3C1, (0.03%), T3C2, (0.05%), T3C3, (0.07%) and T3C4, (0.09%). There is marked reduction in above mentioned parameters at T3C4, (0.09%) compared to control plants.

KEYWORDS: Pesticides; Red delicious.

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Mustafa S, Khan A, Effect of Systemic Pesticide on Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Cultivar Red Delicious. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2010;7(1)

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Mustafa S, Khan A, Effect of Systemic Pesticide on Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Cultivar Red Delicious. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2010;7(1). Available from: https://www.biotech-asia.org/?p=9759

Introduction

Among the various temperate fruits grown in hills and mountains apple (Malus pumila Mill) belongs to family Rosaceae and subfamily Maloideae is the premier fruit, has been under cultivation since times immortal. Fruits have a pivotal role in the diet for maintenance of health and prevention of diseases. A wide range of pesticides ( 13 – 14%) are used for the production of fruits and vegetables in India due to heavy pest infestation throughout the cropping season of horticultural crops whereas cropped area is only 3% (Agnihotri, 1999). Pesticides have potentially adverse effects on fruits and human health (Perez Bendito, 1999). Because of the wide spread use, their toxic residues have been reported in fruits (Kumari et al., 1996, 2002, 2003), (Frank et al., 1987). Systemic pesticides are largest and most important group of pesticides, developed in 1960s for controlling fungal diseases in plants (Siegel, 1981). They tend to be much more effective than many other chemicals and they generally require relatively low levels of application (Davis et al., 1988, Gilley and Fletcher, 1977).

Material and Methods

The present study is taken up on 10 year old Red Delicious apple trees grown at research farm of Pomology, SKUAST – K Shalimar (Sgr) situated at 34.01o North latitude and 74.89o East latitude, at an elevation of 1685 m above the mean sea level. The maximum and minimum temperature ranges between 5.6Co to 29.3Co and 2.5Co to 16.5Co . The experiments are laid out in Randomized block design (RBD) with four replications for each treatment. The foliar application of systemic fungicide triadimefon (WP) is applied at fruit development stage with different treatment concentrations ranging from 0.00 to 0.09% designed as Control, (0.00), T3C1, (0.03%), T3C2, (0.05%), T3C3, (0.07%) and  T3C4, (0.09%).

Ten fruits from each treatment per replication were taken to determine the fruit length and diameter, measured with the help of verneer calliper scale. The pedicle length is measured with the same scale and length: diameter ratio of fruits is calculated by dividing length with diameter. Fruit total soluble solids (TSS) were measured by the method Rangana, (1986). Five fruits from each treatment per replication were taken. A hand refractometer (range 0-33 °Brix, Erm make, Japan, No. A 90067, Bellingham & Stanley Ltd, England) range is used and values were corrected at 20°C. After each reading, the prism of the refractometer is cleaned with tissue paper and methanol, and dried before re-use. The refractometer is standarised against distilled water. Fruit firmness is calculated as per the method A.O.A.C, (1980). Five fruits from each treatment per replication were taken. Each fruit is punctured at three different places on their surface after removing about one square inch peel. Firmness is measured by pentometer and recorded in Kg/cm2 all the values obtained were averaged.

The average fruit yield and yield efficiency were calculated by the method of Westwood and Roberts, (1970). Two representative branches, randomly selected from each treatment per replication including control plants were taken. The yield is expressed as Kg tree-1 and yield efficiency is calculated by the formula

Yield efficiency       =       Fruit yield (Kg tree-1)

TTCSA (cm 2)

Where,

TTCSA =   Tree trunk cross sectional area (cm2)

The data is analyzed statistically, (ANOVA) is done as per the method of Singh and Choudhary, (1977).

Results

Treatment Concentrations Pedicle

 length

 (cm)

Fruit

 length

(cm)

Fruit diameter

(cm)

Length : diameter

(cm)

Flesh firmness

(kg/ cm2)

Total soluble solids

(%)

Average yield

( Kg tree-1)

Yield

 efficiency

( %)

Control 1.87 5.52 7.19 0.76 7.02 10.11 92.21 0.70
T3C1 (0.03%) 1.93 6.59 8.29 0.79 7.09 11.32 107.11 0.72
T3C2 (0.05%) 1.84 5.47 7.10 0.77 6.97 11.26 90.94 0.68
T3C3 (0.07%) 1.82 5.44 6.95 0.78 6.92 10.95 89.26 0.66
T3C4 (0.09%) 1.78 5.42 6.92 0.78 6.88 10.75 88.17 0.63
CD (P=0.05) 0.004 0.07 0.005   0.01 0.008 0.21 0.006
CD (P=0.01) 0.006 0.10 0.007   0.02 0.01 0.29 0.008

 

Table showing the effect of different treatment concentrations of triadimefon (WP) sprayed at fruit development stage on physico-chemical characteristics of apple fruit cultivar Red Delicious.

Results and Disscution

The effect of systemic pesticides on fruit qualitative and quantative parameters is attributed to two factors. In addition to their primary fungicidal effects they often have physiological advantageous and depressive side effects. The decrease in pedicle, fruit length,  width, length: width, yield efficiency and average fruit yield were found at T3C4, (0.09%) compared to control, the results are in conformity with the findings of Jones et al., (1991), Steffens et al., (1992)  Saxena et al., (2000).). The fruit firmness is found to increase at T3C1, (0.03%) in comparison to control, similar results are reported by Calvo, (2000), Bound, (2001), Luo et al., (1988), Magnitsky et al., (2006). The total soluble solids (TSS) increases at T3C1, (0.03%) compared to control, similar results are reported by Tiku and Dar, (1980), Tripathi et al., (1993). The increase in the average  fruit yield and yield efficiency at T3C1, (0.03%) compared to control, might be due to growth enhancing effect of tridimefon in comparison to control, the results are in agreement with the reports of Stevens and Palmer, (1980), Singh and Dhillion, (1986). It might also be due to assimilate partioning of the plant, as the demand is unidirectional to developing fruit, because of enhanced vegetative growth like increase in leaf area, chlorophyll and soluble sugar content as observed in the present study, similar results are reported by Vijayalakshmi and Sirivasan, (2000).                       

References

  1.  A.O.A.C. 1980. Methods of analysis, Association of official and Agricultural Chemists, Washington, D.C, USA.
  2. Agnihotri, N.P. 1999. Pesticide Safety Evaluation and Monitoring, Division of Agriculture Chemicals, Indian Agriculture Research Institute, New Delhi, pp, 14.
  3. Bound, S.A. 2001. The influence of endothal and 6-benzyladenine on crop load and fruit quality of Red Delicious apple. Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology, 76(6): 691-699.
  4.  Calvo, G. 2002. Effect of 1- methylcyclopropene (1- MCP) in apple cv Red Delicious harvested at three stages of maturity and stored at conventional cold and controlled atmosphere conditions. Revista. de .   Agropecuarias, 31(3): 9-24.
  5. Davis, T.D, Steffens, G.L and Sankhla, N. 1988.  Triazole Plant Growth Regulators. Timber press, Portland, Oregon, pp. 99- 105.
  6. Frank, R, Braun, H.E and Ripley, B.D. 1987. Residues of insecticides, fungicides and herbicides in fruits produced in Ontario, Canada. Environ. Contam. Toxicol, 39: 272- 279.
  7.  Gilley, A and Fletcher, R.A.1997. Relative efficiency of paclobutrazol, propiconazole and tetraconazole as stress protectants in wheat seedlings. Plant Growth Regul, 21: 169-175.
  8. Kumari, B, Singh, R, Madan, V.K, Kumar, R and Kathpal, T.S. 1996. DDT and HCH compounds in soils, ponds and drinking water of Haryana, India. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol, 57(5): 787-793.
  9. Kumari, B, Madan, V.K, Kumar, R and Kathpal, T.S. 2002. Monitoring of seasonal vegetables for pesticide residues. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 74: 263- 270.
  10.  Kumari, B, Singh, R, Madan, V.K and Singh, J. 2003. Magnitude of pesticidal contamination in winter vegetables from Hisar, Haryana. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 87: 311-318.
  11. Luo, Y. H, Wainwright and Moore, K.G. 1989. Effect of orchard application of paclobutrazol on the composition and firmness of apple fruits. Scientia Horticulturae, 39: 301-309.
  12.  Magnitskly Stainslav, Pasian Claudico, C and Bennet. 2006. Effects of soaking cucumber and tomato seeds in paclobutrazol solution on fruit weight, fruit set, and paclobutrazol level in fruits. HortScience, 41: 1446-1448.
  13.  Perez Bedito, D and Rubios, S. 1999. Environmental Analytical Chemistry (volume XXXIII Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry): Elsevier: Amsterdam.
  14.  Rangana, S. 1986. Hand Book of Analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetable products, 2nd Ed, Tata Mcgraw Hill, pub, New Delhi, pp. 190-210.
  15.  Siegel, M.R. 1981. Sterol- inhibiting fungicides: Effects on sterol biosynthesis and sites of action. Plant Diseases, 65: 986-989.
  16.  Singh, R.K and Choudhary, B.D. 1977. Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India, pp. 53- 59.
  17. Singh, Z and Dhillon, B.S. 1986. Effects of plant regulators on floral malformation, flowering, productivity and fruit quality of mango (Magnifera indica L). Acta Horticulturae, 175: 315-320.
  18. Stevens, D.B and Palmer, G.M. 1980. Winter wheat diseases control. Stat. Ann. Report, 72: 20-23.
  19. Vijayalakshmi, D and Srinivasan, P.S. 2002. Impact of chemicals and growth regulators on induction of flowering in ‘off’ year mango cv Alphanso. Orissa Journal Horticulture, 30:32-34.
  20. Westwood, M.N and Roberts, A.N. 1970. The relationship between trunk cross sectional area and weight of the apple. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci, 95: 23-30.
(Visited 90 times, 1 visits today)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.