Volume 13, number 1
 Views: (Visited 1,822 times, 1 visits today)    PDF Downloads: 1672

Karimi M. O, Shariati M. M, Zerehdaran S, Moradi M. H, Javadmanesh A. Study of Genetic Diversity of Sheep Breeds In Afghanistan. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2016;13(1)
Manuscript received on : 02 January 2016
Manuscript accepted on : 14 February 2016
Published online on:  26-02-2016
How to Cite    |   Publication History    |   PlumX Article Matrix

Study of Genetic Diversity of Sheep Breeds In Afghanistan

Mohammad Osman Karimi1, Mohammad Mahdi Shariati1*, Saeed Zerehdaran1, Mohammad Hossein Moradi2, Ali Javadmanesh1

1Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FMU) 2Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Arak University, Arak, Iran

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bbra/2072

ABSTRACT: Livestock production, such as mutton, milk and egg are important both as food and as trading staples. On the other hand, exterior exchange is being gained from selling the hide, wool, and other sub-products of the animals. The objective of this study is analysis of selected markers search as comparisons of two breeds among three Arab, Baluch and Gadic breeds. Mutual comparisons are conducted for detecting differences between breeds and accurately analyzing these differences. In this research the methods of haplotypic blocks analysis in experimental regions, the way of their erosions and LD graphs are drawn using Haploview v4.2 Software. Inputs used in this software consists genotypic information of markers in experimental regions and statistics that are used for LD calculation are the same correlational coefficients between r2 and surrounding SNPs.Animals and Samples Collection In this study, 45  blood samples were collected from three districts of Herat province (Shindand, Gulran and Obe) of three Afghan sheep breeds (Arabi, Baluchi and Gadic). 10 µL of blood was collected via the jugular vein in Venoject tubes with EDTA (Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetic Acid)for prevention of coagulation blood was collected immediately stored at 4 °C in the refrigerator. DNA was extracted from blood using the GenElute™ Blood Genomic DNA Kit. DNA concentration was determined using NanoDrop (Spectrophotometer ND-1000).Considering excess of heterozygosity within studied breeds, one can conclude that these breeds are not threatening in terms of heterozygosity decline and can be considered as an appropriate genetic reserve for different husbandry and eugenic purposes in Afghanistan. Furthermore high heterozygosity in studied chromosomes in Arab, Baluch and Gadic races suggests high diversity within population in spite of carrying out eugenic activities on livestock due to managerial plans which has managed to reduce the consistency level and keep the diversity in acceptable level.

KEYWORDS: Genetic diversity; sheep breed; LD graph; SNP; Afghanistan; Heterozygosity

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Karimi M. O, Shariati M. M, Zerehdaran S, Moradi M. H, Javadmanesh A. Study of Genetic Diversity of Sheep Breeds In Afghanistan. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2016;13(1)

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Karimi M. O, Shariati M. M, Zerehdaran S, Moradi M. H, Javadmanesh A. Study of Genetic Diversity of Sheep Breeds In Afghanistan. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2016;13(1). Available from: https://www.biotech-asia.org/?p=6800

Introduction

Afghanistan is a completely landlocked country, which lies between 29° and 38° N and 61° and 75° E (Thieme, 2006; Anwar U.H. and Lal R, 2007). Furthermore, it is bounded on the north by Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, on the east by China and Pakistan, on the south by Pakistan and on the west by Iran. Access from the north is good; the eastern frontier is blocked by some of the world’s highest mountain ranges: the Karakoram and the Pamir.

As mentioned earlier, Afghanistan has a different climate. The seasonal climate varies from one region to other region.

Afghanistan is a mountainous country; therefore there are alterations between north and south, west and east areas. It shows a big variety of ecological conditions, also a big variety of vegetation types which cover the land surface. These vegetation types are consisting of a high biodiversity (Breckle, 2007; Shank, 2008).

Around 2/3 population of Afghanistan is engaged in agriculture and, particularly in field of livestock. Most of animal products in Afghanistan are meat, milk, egg, wool, hide (raw skins of cattle, sheep, etc.); animals are also used for the purpose of work and transportation. The meat is mainly from mutton which is a one year old or older. Cattle, buffalo, sheep and goat are the main species which produce milk while meat is produced by cattle, sheep, goat and poultry. The most specialized sheep breeds, such as Karakul, are used majorly for producing hide and in the other hand; the yarn made from wool comes from sheep, goat and camel. Finally, cattle, horse, mule and camel are used in agricultural labors and for transformational purposes. The comprehensive picture of the distribution of livestock species in Afghanistan is reported in.

Herat province due to plain areas and temperate climate is ideal for small ruminant rearing. There are 9.11% sheep, goats with 9.2%. Furthermore, this province has the 9.8% of the Afghanistan donkey population.

The total number of camels in Afghanistan is 175,270, from which about 17.81% exists in Kandahar province. It is because this province is one of the warmest areas and has the major parts of deserts in Afghanistan and camels are well adapted to this environment. People, especially Kuchi, use camel mainly for transport, during seasonal migration. Nangarhar province has the highest percentage (8.6%) of poultry. This province is neighbor to Pakistan, and all the mother stock eggs for the incubator, and also the three-day-old chickens are imported from Pakistan.   In general, production level per animal is low compared to the other countries. However, an improvement of livestock production, both in terms of quantity and quality, is of essential importance for Afghanistan for many following reasons.

According to the current statistical data, around 50.6 percent of the country exports were agricultural and livestock products, while the 17.5% of total exports of the country is represented by carpet (7.2 %), leather and hide (5.6 %), karakul (2 %), wool (2.7 %), intestine (0.4 %) (Zia, 2005).

The livestock kept in Afghanistan is typically raised for local consumption and to generate income through sale of livestock and livestock products.So, the animal products are low due to lack of knowledge of giving proper diet to the animals by the breeders. Another reason is lack of local marketing and the link with the national market. If we compare cosmopolitan breeds, Holstein, Brown Swiss and Jersey local breeds, Kandahari, Konari with Sistani breeds,theyproduce much less milk in the same lactation period than those of cosmopolitan.

Livestock production, such as mutton, milk and egg are important both as food and as trading staples. On the other hand, exterior exchange is being gained from selling the hide, wool, and other sub-products of the animals. As we know, a major part of the country has a particular topography which cannot be used for cultivation and agricultural purposes, but an unlikely effective use from these areas are essential as pasture for livestock fodders.So, livestock is a beneficial and effective occupation that provides good engagement for the farmers alone or beside the normal agricultural activities (Jahesh, 2011).

Sheep husbandry is a job opportunity for Afghan communities to generate income by sheep products which include hide, fat, mutton, milk and milk products (cream, butter, curd (dried whey), yogurt, and cheese). These are the major income resources for sheep breeders. In some parts of the country some farmers are keeping their sheep to be fattened and slaughtered in the beginning of winter for dried meat or mutton (local name is Lahndi or qadid, air-dried salted meat often lamb) to be consumed during the winter. (Ulfat & Iqbal, 2000).

The Arabi sheep breed

The Arabi sheep is the third most important sheep breed in the Heart province. This breed makes up 13% of all sheep in Afghanistan (Omid, 2009). It is found in Gulran, Karukh, Guzara and Injil districts. The local name of this breed in Herat province is Buri. This breed is fat-rumped, has long ears and both sexes are polled. The majority of these sheep are black with a characteristic white stripe along the forehead however in Herat province most Arabi sheep breeds have brown color.  Accumulation of fat makes up two separate mass in the tail. These sheep are a large-farmed sheep with 45-50 Kg of body weight and a good mutton conformation and fattening ability. This breed is mainly used for meat, and short coarse wool. They have poor quality wool production 1.2-1.7kg. The milk yield of this breed during 130-140 days of a lactation period is 45-55 Kg. The fertility is (65-80 %) with (0-2%) chance of twinning. The sex mature rate is 6-8 months (Rashiq, 2006).

Figure 1: Arabi sheep breed Figure 1: Arabi sheep breed

Click here to View figure

The Baluchi breed makes up 13% of all sheep in Afghanistan (Omid, 2009). The wool color is white but there are some black spots around its mouth, nose, feet and its bottom parts. They have rather long earsand both ewe and ram are polled. They belong to fat-tailed breeds, the local name of this breed in Herat province is Guldom. This breed is found in Shindand, Zendajan Ghoryan Obe, Rabat Sangi and Kushki kuhna districts and has a better adaptation, to the arid range and desert areas.  The annual greasy fleece weight is 1.3-2 Kg. The Baluchi is a medium-sized sheep with average body weight of 34-36 Kg. This is the meaty and wooly type breed. The birth rate of this breed is (60-75%) with (0-1%) chance of twinning. The milk yield during 120-130 days of a lactation period is 35-40 Kg (Zafar, 2005; Rashiq, 2006).  It produces good quality carpet wool.

Figure 2: Baluchi sheep breed Figure 2: Baluchi sheep breed

Click here to View figure

The Gadik Sheep Breed

This breed is mainly reared in Badakhshan (Wakhan) but also they are found in Obe, kushki kuhnaand Rabat Sangi Wakhan Gadikare. The breed is mostly white but there are some black and brown spots on the head and feet. In Wakhan Gadik have better adaptation and I choose for the study the Wakhan Gadik breed. Panjsher Gadik is dark brown and white

The Gadik sheep breed has small and short structure and belongs to fat-tailed. The ewes are polled and rams have strong horns. These breeds make up 1% of all sheep in Afghanistan.  Gadik produces the finest wool amongst other breeds.  It has 81.4% pure wool and 18.6 % hair in its wool fiber. The weight of an adult ewe is 25 to 28 kg, it produces 30 to 35 Kg of milk and the period of lactation is 120 to130 days. It produces wool 0.6 to 0.9 Kg annually, and the percentage of producing lamb is 65- 75% and the percentage of producing twin lambs is 0-1%. Some authors have declared that this breed can adapt to other environments other than their current environment (Rashiq, 2006; Omid, 2009).

Figure 3: Gadik sheep breed Figure 3: Gadik sheep breed

Click here to View figure

Table 1: Herat province total population of sheep by district

No. District Head No. District Head
1 ADRASKAN 22166 9 KOHSAN 50987
2 CHISHTI SHARIF 8641 10 KUSHKI KUHNA 35799
3 FARSI 5579 11 OBE 37499
4 GHORYAN 86652 12 PASHTUN ZARGHUN 29636
5 GULRAN 175077 13 RABAT I SANGI 73505
6 GUZARA 26740 14 SHINDAND 111413
7 INJIL 50207 15 ZINDA JAN 37959
8 KARUKH 38848
Total 413910 376798

Reasons why these three breeds were chosen for the study of ovinebiodiversity in Afghanistan are as follow;Arabi sheep are well adapted for Gulran, Karukh, Guzara and Injil districts. These parts have a colder climate and flatter terrain, which suits this large breed than other areas of Herat province. Arabi breed can better tolerate the coldness.  The Baluchi sheep are better adapted for the Shindand, Zendajan, Ghoryan, Obe, Rabat Sangi and Kushki Kohna districts. In the south and southwest of Herat province, Baluchi sheep, are better adapted to the environment, because these areas are warm, and plain area. According to sheep breeders, Baluchi sheep have a better ability to walk than other breeds and they can even eat the dry stems of some of the thistle (alhagi). The Gadik sheep breeds are better adapted for the Obe, Rabat Sangi and Koshki kohna districts. This breed has a better compatibility for cold and high-altitude areas, because these sheep are light weight and they can use the Highland pastures.  In Figure 4 is illustrated the percentage of these three sheep breeds in the province of Herat.

Figure 4: Percentage of three breeds of sheep based on total sheep population of different districts in Herat province  

Figure 4: Percentage of three breeds of sheep based on total sheep population of different districts in Herat province

Click here to View figure

GeneticDiversity

Genetic diversity plays an important role in the lives of most species that live longer. Diversity in genetics occurs at the molecular level as it is the key to the development of past, present and future of agriculture and animals, so it’s very important to know the information about the population of animals farm and their genetics in animal breeding (Esmail-Khanian et al., 2007).

Genetic diversity is represented in the observation that there is a diversity of genes within single species. Other genetic diversities can occur in random mutation at the molecular level.

Genetic diversity is the variation of heritable characteristics of a population.Genetic diversity shows a diversity of genes within a single animal. The others can occur randomly in mutation at the molecular level.

Genetic diversity is the variation of heritable characteristics in the same species population. It plays a significant role in evolution by allowing a species to adapt to a new environment and to stand against parasites.

Importance of genetic diversity for the sustainability of livestock

The term of biodiversity has been introduced as “the wealth of the poor” (World Resources Institute 2005) because the biodiversity provides goods and services for the poor who tend to live in the rural areas and their lives are dependent on land. For example, a productive crop and grazing land, fuel, building materials and wild fish. Land rich in biodiversity is a form of wealth, even if that wealth cannot be measured in strictly monetary terms.  Genetic diversity is essential for the sustainability of livestock (and other) species for a variety of reasons:

Genetic diversity within the breed: for long-term genetic improvement of livestock breeds, and the election of new features or attributes in a changing environment. Also to avoid inbreeding is important because of low performance.

Genetic diversity between breeds: Local breeds for the support and maintenance of genetic diversity in animals with high production are used. The local breeds have specific social and economic value; these animals have good adaptation with the toughest conditions. Furthermore the local breed is one of our cultural heritages (Gandini & Villa, 2003).

The genetic diversity found in livestock allows livestock keepers to help the livestock to resist disease, environmental change, marketing of livestock, etc. Maybe it is impossible to predict. Most breeds are rare today due to the loss of products and lack of good market. The Finn sheep, for example, was cast aside by commercial breeders decades ago and kept only by Finnish peasants.

Molecular marker sand marker assisted selection

Molecular markers are useful tools in an accurate method that can substitute the traditional and classical genetic techniques for betterment and amelioration of eugenic programs and differentiation within the breeds.Molecular markers can be better alternative sources of information for estimating genetic diversity, in the case of missing dynasty data or pedigree errors. Indeed when the information of pedigree is available for markers, they may allow estimating the genetic diversity more exactly.

Genetic markers are differentiators between the DNA of each chromosome that is transferred from a parent to the descendants. Mostly when they are used between individuals, populations, species, breeds… they are called genetic markers that differentiate and distinguish them from one another. A genetic marker requires polymorphism (variation) and the heritability.In the past genetic diversity studies such as Allozymes, also they were studied on the base of protein variants in enzymes and the reason was that the number of loci and polymorphism level was low and the other markers have taken over.

SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) markers, for assessing genome-wide genetic variation, provide new possibilities for genetic diversity and selection in QTL analysis. Studies of SNP markers are now using SNPs in genomic selection in livestock breeds (Zenger et al., 2007; Muir et. al., 2008; Kijas et. al., 2009).

They are series of DNA which are connected to the genes that lie under a quantitative trait.Mapping regions of the genomes that include genes which are classified as quantitative characteristics are done using molecular tags as AFLP or mostly as SNPs.

This is an early-used stage in identifying and sequencing the actual genes that lie under the characteristic variation. Quantitative characteristics refer to phenotypes that vary in degree and can be ascribe to polygenic effects. For example: production of 2 or more genes and their environment.

Advantages of genetic diversity estimation with SNP markers

In addition to pedigree information, SNP markers help us to realize whatthe DNA is. Using SNP markers gives more information than Pedigree Charts, and the information is more accurate. Therefore, if pedigree information is missing, SNP markers can provide more data. Combining Pedigree and SNP data is a good way to estimate Genetic Diversity. We can also use SNP to see genetic diversity at the genome level. It allows us to identify low and high regions of diversity of the genome. If low regions have been identified, they can be conserved (Vanraden, 2007). Because low regions can be easily under the study, research and control.

When the sub population has the same allele frequency equals to zero and when all allele are different this coefficient is 1.  is and indicator of genetic diversity of all population and is always positive.  and   are indicators of deviation from Hardy-Winberg Equilibrium respectively within the subpopulation and in all population. Their positive values indicate reduction of heterozygosity and their negative values indicates the increase of heterozygosity.

His the total gene diversity or expected heterozygosity In the population.

HI is within population gene diversity or average observed heterozygosity in a group of communities.

His average expected heterozygosity   in each sub population.

Fst in the range of 0 to 0.05 indicate less genetic diversity, in range of 0.05 to 0.25 indicates more genetic diversity.

F indices make the analysis of sub population possible. These indices can be used to measure the genetic distances between populations. With the assumption of the sub population which had matting has different allele frequencies from total population ones (Krap et al 1998).

Materials and Methods

Data collection and DNA extraction:

Animals and Samples Collection In this study, 45 blood samples were collected from three districts of Herat province (Shindand, Gulran and Obe) of three Afghan sheep breeds (Arabi, Baluchi and Gadic). 10 µL of blood was collected via the jugular vein in Venoject tubes with EDTA (Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetic Acid)for prevention of coagulation blood was collected immediately stored at 4 °C in the refrigerator. DNA was extracted from blood using the GenElute™ Blood Genomic DNA Kit. DNA concentration was determined using NanoDrop (Spectrophotometer ND-1000).

Genotyping using Ovine 50K SNPChip and data mining:

A total of 15 Arabi, 15 Balochi and 15 Gadik sheep breed were genotyped at 53862 SNP loci with the OvineSNP chip50K Beadchip (http://www.illumina.com). usually those SNP that had been assigned to the 26 autosomes and X chromosome was measured) Then for each SNP, minor allele frequency (MAF) (over all animals) less than 2% were removed and percentage of calls rate ≤ 95% (how many sheep the marker worked for) was removed (Teo YY, Fry AE, Clark TG, Tai ES, Seielstad M: On the usage of HWE for identifying genotyping errors. Annals of Human Genetics 2007, 71:701-703).

For the remaining SNPs outlier departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p < 10-2) over all animals of a breed were used for identifying genotyping errors (Teo YY, Fry AE, Clark TG, Tai ES, Seielstad M: On the usage of HWE for identifying genotyping errors. Annals of Human Genetics 2007, 71:701-703). After edits, 47326 markers for Arabi vs Balochi, 46284 marker for Arabi vs Gadik and 47159 for Baluchi vs Gadik were retained for the study. Missing data were replaced with the most frequent allele at that specific locus. Allele frequencies and observed and expected heterozygosity were calculated for each breed.

Statistical analysis based on LD and Haplotypical length;

One very productive way for recognition of done selections in genome level is to utilize analysis based on LD. Because as it is said, selection for a beneficial allele is accompanied with selection of loci that are attached around.

Unlike analysis such as; FST, methods based on LD depend to frequency and distance between SNPs because these analysis are multiple.

The most important statistical analysis used in this way are; EHH (Extended Haplotype Homozygosity), his (Integrated Haplotype Score) and XP-EHH (Cross-Population EHH) (Sabeti et, al, 2002; Prasad et, al, 2006).

In this research the methods of haplotypic blocks analysis in experimental regions, the way of their erosions and LD graphs are drawn using Haploview v4.2 Software. Inputs used in this software consistsgenotypic information of markers in experimental regions and statistics that are used for LD calculation are the same correlational coefficients between r2 and surrounding SNPs.

Statistical Analysis and Calculation of Population Differentiation between Different Breed Pairs:

Total   allelic frequencies for each locus, and   considering all animals as a single population was calculated as:

Vol13_No1_stud_moh_formula1

Where pop.1=number of individuals in population1 and pop.2=number of individuals in population2.

Vol13_No1_stud_moh_formula2

Then, expected heterozygosities in populations (Hs) and overall (Ht) were calculated. Finally, Fst was calculated according to Weir and Cockerham (1984):

Vol13_No1_stud_moh_formula3

After calculated Fst I calculate the wim5 Fst , for this calculation I did average  from every4 Fst and  I deleted two first Fst and two end Fst from every chromosome  (-180 Fst from 27 chromosome) finally calculated Win5 Fst Manhattan Plot and Fst Manhattan Plot.

Study of Homozygosity and Heterozygosity in Different Breeds

A way for recognition of selection among the breeds and recognition of breeds that are aimed for selection is the homozygosity comparison over the genomic region. Considering two distinct breeds, selection can be done in two ways; firstly when a beneficial mutation is only selected in one of the breeds while selection isn’t aimed for the other breed. It is expected to show one of those two above-mentioned homozygosity breeds in one genomic region while the other breed isn’t under such a consideration.

Secondly if different alleles of one mutation in the considered breeds are selected in two different directions, it means selection is done for one of the alleles in each breed, so that it is expected to show both above-mentioned homozygosity breeds. Within this research homozygosity for each SNP marker is first determined by valuing 1 and 0 for homozygote and heterozygote markers in order and then average length of homozygosity is calculated for each SNP considering near-bordered SNPs in Microsoft Excel 2010 and related plot is drawn on two sides of candidate genomic region in each breed. Thus in these graphs values are indicator of average length of homozygosity for each SNP considering at homozygosity in near-bordered SNPs. This analysis is the same as study of LD in the region that in which homozygosity is indicator of the selection in the same genomic region.

Results and discussion

Data filtration obtained from determining samples genotypes for doing final analysis

90 animals including 30 samples from each Baluch, Arabic and Gadic breed have been genotyped through Ovine BeadChip arrays. At the beginning after primary control in the genotype determination step, two animals (one from Arab breed and one from Gadic breed) are eliminated from subsequent analysis methods due to having more than 10% lost genotype and finally 99 animals are remained for subsequent steps. Different stages of SNP markers filtration are presented in table 1-4.

Edition stage Arab-Baluch Arab-Gadic Baluch-Gadic
Total of animals 30 30 30
Eliminating samples due to having more than 10% obtained genotype 0 1 1
Number of remained samples 30 29 29
Number of SNPs 53862 53862 53862
  2665 2659 2758
Eliminating SNPs with MAF<2% in sum of samples
Eliminating SNPs with Call rate <95% in sample sum 3870 3900 3797
Number of remained samples 47327 47303 47307

In sum 47327, 47303 and 47307 SNP markers have managed to pass quality control stages in Baluch, Arab and Gadic breed, respectively. As for SNPs, 2665, 2659 and 2758 SNP have been eliminated in Baluch, Arab and Gadic breeds respectively, due to MAF less than 0.02. Similarly, 3870, 3900 and 3797 SNPs have been eliminated in Baluch, Arab and Gadic breeds respectively, due to 0.05 obtained Genotype and finally 47327, 47303 and 47307 SNP markers are remained for subsequent analysis. Finally, SNPs which have passed through all quality control steps are kept for subsequent analysis. This information has been used for PCA analysis, population structure and LD structure.

PCA analysis, population structure, population differentiation index

In this paper, population structure and manner in which these three sheep population of Afghanistan are examined in their breed groups from PCA analysis through information of samples genotypes by Admixture software. PCA analysis results showed that the studied population can be found in quite distinct groups based on PC1 and PC2 information and only one animal belong to Gadic breed has stood away from its own breed group, but the same breed has no overlap with other breeds too and probably they are some half breed from studied populations. This sample is eliminated from subsequent analysis.

Figure 5 Figure 5

Due to scarcity of remained animals by elimination of one animal from Gadic breed 44 animals remained for subsequent analysis is taken into account. Considering PC2, Arab, Baluch and Gadic populations are separated from each other. In another study in species such as car, sheep and pig animals are classified only based on special vectors I and II and according to breed and geographical region (Gibbs, et al., 2009., Yang et al., 2012). By the same population diversity one can hope to find some points from genome which are selected in a significant manner. Moreover, due to natural selection during adaption, a set of selection is taken place on these species. This gives rise to population differentiation. Adaptation with local environments and artificial selection can alter allele frequency on genome special positions. In fact, frequency of decent alleles increases in selected position and it results in population differentiation numerical value (FST) higher than expected (Akey et al, 2002).  Obtained population differentiation for studied populations shows low and middle population differentiation. Results of population differentiation analysis confirm presence of three distinct populations or breed.

 Statistics related to SNP markers and their distribution on Afghani sheep chromosomes

Table 2: Properties of used SNPs in analysis related to breed comparing Arab-Baluch breeds and distance between them on different chromosomes

Chromosome Number of SNP markers Average of distance

(bp)

Minimum distance (bp) Maximum distance (bp)

 

length of genome (bp)
1 5157 58108.32318 1753 941607 299548406
2 4815 54634.94516 1936 898517 263012626
3 4390 55292.28731 5326 872478 242677849
4 2362 53838.01991 5393 467514 127111565
5 2084 56048.1037 65 842189 116748200
6 2305 55995.12717 5342 2936691 129012773
7 2022 53770.69767 5383 1133529 108670580
8 1766 55394.53341 5458 624774 97826746
9 1886 53469.55756 5353 789815 100790116
10 1634 57622.2774 3113 3418843 94097179
11 1036 64602.43865 5300 489036 66863524
12 1481 58144.42297 5288 953643 86053746
13 1487 59564.32301 5478 902996 88512584
14 1055 65227.07021 5365 873165 68749332
15 1489 60373.71102 5414 2321143 89836082
16 1381 55920.54275 5786 616675 77170349
17 1267 61960.35229 5434 562710 78441806
18 1250 57557.78463 5366 558227 71889673
19 1105 58690.71558 5353 507338 64794550
20 1020 54509.49657 5499 729287 55545177
21 783 70371.56777 5363 1970435 55030566
22 973 56603.15123 5312 2215283 55018263
23 976 67955.15795 5622 715163 66256279
24 639 69399.67712 5514 406074 44276994
25 880 54641.2537 5514 589556 48029662
26 804 62043.45953 915 1691855 49820898
27 1279 100107.4844 5314 2336684 127937365
total 60438.76 65 3418843 2773722890

 

Table 3: Properties of used SNPs in analysis related to breed comparing Arab-Gadic breeds and distance between them on different chromosomes

chromosome Number of SNP markers average of distance

(bp)

Minimum distance (bp) Maximum distance (bp)

 

length of genome (bp)
1 5150 58176.03535 1753 941607 299548406
2 4809 54703.12521 1936 898517 263012626
3 4390 55292.28731 5326 872478 242677849
4 2362 53838.01991 5393 467514 127111565
5 2094 55780.31534 65 842189 116748200
6 2311 55849.68528 5344 2936691 129012773
7 2020 53823.96236 5383 1133529 108670580
8 1771 55269.34802 5385 668174 97826746
9 1880 53640.2959 5353 789815 100790116
10 1645 57236.72689 3113 3418843 94052172
11 1027 65169.12671 5300 489036 66863524
12 1473 58357.04755 5288 953643 85901574
13 1484 59684.81726 5478 902996 88512584
14 1057 65103.53409 5283 873165 68749332
15 1486 60495.67811 5414 2321143 89836082
16 1368 56452.34016 5786 616675 77170349
17 1254 62539.89385 5434 562710 78362487
18 1254 29975.47087 5366 558227 71889673
19 1095 59227.19378 5353 507338 64794550
20 1020 54509.49657 5499 729287 55545177
21 783 70371.56777 5363 1970435 55030566
22 976 56428.98769 5312 2215283 55018263
23 982 67539.53007 5622 688072 66256279
24 639 69399.67712 5514 406074 44276994
25 880 54641.2537 5514 589556 48029662
26 807 61812.52854 915 1691855 49820898
27 1285 99639.69237 5314 2336684 127937365
Total 59442.88 65 3418843 2773446392

 

Table 4: Properties of used SNPs in analysis related to breed comparing Baluch-Gadic breeds and distance between them on different chromosomes

chromosome Number of SNP markers average of distance

(bp)

Minimum distance (bp) Maximum distance (bp)

 

length of genome (bp)
1 5143 58255.23259 1753 941607 299548406
2 4807 54725.88972 1936 898517 263012626
3 4383 55380.61365 5326 872478 242677849
4 2367 53724.24556 5393 467514 127111565
5 2079 56182.96439 65 842189 116748200
6 2301 56092.51 5342 2936691 129012773
7 2018 53877.33267 5383 1133529 108670580
8 1774 55175.82967 5458 593142 97826746
9 1881 53611.76383 5353 789815 100790116
10 1656 56856.30151 3113 3418843 94097179
11 1032 64853.07856 5300 489036 66863524
12 1480 58080.84787 5288 953643 85901574
13 1494 59285.05291 5478 902996 88512584
14 1055 65227.07021 5283 873165 68749332
15 1481 60700.05541 5414 2321143 89836082
16 1376 56123.89018 5786 616675 77170349
17 1269 61862.62303 5434 562710 78441806
18 1252 57465.76579 5366 558227 71889673
19 1095 59227.19378 5353 507338 64794550
20 1023 54349.48826 5499 729287 55545177
21 779 70733.37532 5363 1970435 55030566
22 981 56141.08469 5312 2215283 55018263
23 982 67539.53007 5657 688072 66256279
24 638 69508.6248 5514 406074 44276994
25 876 54891.04229 5514 589556 42530665
26 807 61812.52854 915 1691855 49820898
27 1277 100264.3926 5314 2336684 127937365
Total 60442.53 65 3418843 2690901372

 

Figure 6: comparing Fst coefficient through Write method and Theta coefficient through Vier and Cocerham method for genotyped SMPs in the studies breed information Figure 6: comparing Fst coefficient through Write method and Theta coefficient through Vier and Cocerham method for genotyped SMPs in the studies breed information

Click here to View figure

Heterozygosity degree

Heterozygosity is the best and most important method for measuring genetic diversity which can be obtained from total in situ heterozygosity frequency. Figure 7 shows heterozygosity of Arab, Baluch and Gadic breeds in different autosomy chromosomes.

Figure 7 Figure 7

Click here to View figure

Conclusion

In this study, analysis of selection markers search is taken play as mutual comparisons. Mutual comparisons are conducted for detecting differences between breeds and accurately analyzing these differences. Then, identifying selected regions is carried out using Theta statistic. In this paper, some parts of genome is determined as selection markers which in previous studies have been determined as selection markers of Human, cow and livestock. By identifying genes in vicinity of regions and selected SNPs, biologic role of a set of these genes are not identified thoroughly, similarly, for some genes it is probability of mutual influences which are unknown. In general, for accurately identifying role of these genes, one should carry out continuous studies with more performance.

Considering attempt to record from pure livestock of Arab, Baluch and Gadic breeds within collecting Afghani races. However, due to adjacency with keeping place of these breeds with other breeds, it is expected that some undesired mixtures take place. Therefore for examining the manner in which different sample arrange in breed groups, the PCA analysis is used. Results show that except sample livestock 2, all livestock are found in related breeds. One of these animals belonged to Arab breed which has been recorded in gender comparison and by examining information genotype determination; genders of these samples were not matching. Therefore, this sample has been eliminated from final analysis. Another sample was from Gadic breed, similarly this livestock samples has been eliminated from subsequent examinations.

Considering excess of Heterozygosity within studied breeds, one can conclude that these breeds are not threatening in terms of heterozygosity decline and can be considered as an appropriate genetic reserve for different husbandry and eugenic purposes in Afghanistan. Furthermore high heterozygosity in studied chromosomes in Arab, Baluch and Gadic races suggests high diversity within population in spite of carrying out eugenic activities on livestock due to managerial plans which has managed to reduce the consistency level and keep the diversity in acceptable level.

Suggestions

Considering the conducted studies one can suggest:

By whole sheep genome sequencing within each three breeds or at least in some regions of genome which in current paper are identified as selection markers, in future studies one can examine LD structure based statistic with higher density of SNP markers and higher accuracy.

Using other world breeds genomes together with studies breeds and together analyzing population differentiation can be effective in finding selection markers and population structures.

Population genetic structures can be studied more deeply with more detailed on studied populations.

 References

  1. Thieme Olaf (with contributions by J. M. Suttie) FAO 2006, Country Pasture/Forage Resource Profiles Afghanistan.
  2. W.S, 2007, Flora and Vegetation of Afghanistan. Germany.
  3. Zia Ziauddin, 2005, Principal of Livestock,. Prof. Faculty of Agriculture, Kabul University. In Persian (Dary).
  4. Jahesh Aghamir, 2012, Livestockspecialistat the Departmentof Agriculture and Livestockin Herat Province. In Persian (Dary).
  5. Ulfat-un-Nabi Khan (Animal Science) And Iqbal Muzaffar (Economics), 2000, Role and the size of livestock sector in Afghanistan
  6. Omid A Rahim, 2009, Investigation of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry situation in southwest part of Afghanistan. In Dari, Faculty of Agriculture Herat University
  7. Rashiq, Mohamed Hassan, 2006, sheep and goat husbandry. In Persian (Dary).
  8. Zafar Mustafa, 2005, National Livestock Production, Food Agriculture Organization Afghanistan (FAOAFG) National Coordinator of AnGR in Afghanistan.
  9. Gandini G. C E and Villa E, 2003, Analysis of the cultural value of local livestock breeds: a methodology, J. Anim. Genet. 120 (2003), pages 1–11, Dipartimento VSA, Facolta` di Medicina Veterinaria, Milan, Italy and 2Associazione Italiana Allevatori, Rome, Italy.
  10. Zenger, K.R., M.S. Khatkar, J.A.L. Cavanagh, R.J. Hawken, and H.W. Raadsma, 2007, Genome-wide genetic diversity of Holstein Friesian cattle reveals new insights into Australian and global population variability, including impact of selection. Animal Genetics Vol. 38, pages7-14.
  11. VanRaden P.M, 2007,  Genomic Measures of Relationship and Inbreeding. Interbull Bull., 37, 33–36.
(Visited 1,822 times, 1 visits today)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.