Manuscript accepted on : 28 August 2017
Published online on: --
Maroua Yahyaoui1,2, Nessrine Ghazouani1, Ines Sifaoui1,3 and Manef Abderrabba1
1Laboratory Materials, Molecules and Applications (LMMA), Preparatory Institute for Scientific and Technical Studies (IPEST), University of Carthage, La Marsa, Tunisia.
2Faculty of Science of Bizerte, University of Carthage, Bizerte, Tunisia.
3University Institute of Tropical Diseases and Public Health of The Canary Islands University of La LagunaSan Cristóbal de La Laguna Spain.
Corresponding Author E-mail: yahyaoui.maroua@gmail.com
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bbra/2534
ABSTRACT: The present study aims to evaluate the effect of extraction methods namely soxhlet and cold maceration on the quality of T. hirsuta extracts, collected from different geographic regions within Tunisia. Hexane, ethyl acetate and methanol were used as solvent for both extraction processes. Yields varied considerably (from 0.61 to 8.11 %) according to sampling region, organic solvent and extraction method. The various chemical contents extracts were estimated by colorimetric methods, revealing important amounts of polyphenols (from 29.37 ± 1.34 to 259.63 ± 3.17 mg GAE/g) and flavonoids (from 26.22 ± 6.06 to 163.64 ± 3.32 mg QE/g). The antioxidant activity was measured using the DPPH-radical scavenging, the ABTS-radical scavenging and the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays. The antioxidant analysis showed that the methanol extract obtained by both processes exhibited the uppermost capacity to scavenge free radicals. However, the cold maceration technique leads to the richest extract in phenolic compounds compared to soxhlet method.
KEYWORDS: Thymelaea hirsuta L.; phenolic compounds; DPPH; ABTS; FRAP
Download this article as:Copy the following to cite this article: Yahyaoui M, Ghazouani N, Sifaoui I, Abderrabba M. Comparison of the Effect of Various Extraction Methods on the Phytochemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Thymelaea Hirsuta L. Aerial Parts in Tunisia. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2017;14(3). |
Copy the following to cite this URL: Yahyaoui M, Ghazouani N, Sifaoui I, Abderrabba M. Comparison of the Effect of Various Extraction Methods on the Phytochemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Thymelaea Hirsuta L. Aerial Parts in Tunisia. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2017;14(3). Available from: https://www.biotech-asia.org/?p=27197 |
Introduction
Plants have the ability to synthesize compounds, through complex metabolic pathways [1]. These substances can be classified in two different groups such as primary and secondary metabolites. the latter play a key defensive role against the biotic and abiotic stresses [2]. However, plants contain a wide variety of phytochemicals (peptides, terpenes, phenolics, alkaloids, etc.) with very different physicochemical properties and original biological characteristics [3]. Despite the development of industrial compounds in recent years, people are more and more keen to rely on naturally-derived producrs. Consequently, a great number of industrial sectors (cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, agri-food) are increasingly incorporating these biomolecules in their formulations as an alternative to synthetic compounds. The valorization of these bioactive molecules represents an enormous economic potential. These compounds must be first separated from their plant matrix which requires several expensive and time consuming, such as extraction, analysis and identification. Among these steps, extraction is the crucial process involved in the discovery and quantification of bioactive molecule from natural and medicinal plants [4]. In this context, numerous papers have demonstrated the impact of extraction methods on chemical composition and biological activities of plant materials [5-7].
Thymelaea hirsuta L. is a flowering plant species which is widely distributed in the Canary Islands, Mediterranean region, north of Central Europe and Eastern Central Asia. It is an important medicinal plant belonging to the family of Thymeleaceae [8]. The aerial parts of this species are largely used as remedy to treat inflammation, hypertension and as an antiseptic [9-10]. Besides, this plant is particularly used as an ancient medicinal herb against diabetes [11-12]. In addition to that, the phytochemical screening of this species revealed the presence of high phenolic compound contents. Moreover, T. hirsuta extracts were reported to have antimicrobial [13], antitumor [9], antihypoglycemic [14], and antioxidant activities [15-16].
The main objective of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of extraction solvent and methods on the total phenolic content and in vitro antioxidant properties of various organic extracts obtained from T. hirsuta aerial parts.
Material and Methods
Chemicals and Standards
All chemicals used were of analytical reagent grade. All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich-Fluka (Saint-Quentin, France).
Raw Material
T. hirsuta aerial parts were harvested in September 2013 from different localities in Tunisia namely Tunis, Chebba, Kasserine and Fernana. The longitude and latitude of each area were listed in Table 1. The systematic identification of raw materials was confirmed by Mohamed Bousaid (Department of botany, National institute of applied sciences and technology, Tunis, Tunisia).The aerial parts were then dried and subsequently milled into powder with an electric grinder.
Table 1: Geographical coordinates of various growing region of T. hirsuta where samples were collected
Regions | Latitude | Longitude | Altitude |
Tunis | N 36°49′08″ | E 10°09′56″ | 23 |
Chebba | N 35°14′13″ | E 11°06′54″ | 3 |
Fernana | N 36°30′04″ | E8°46′48″ | 143 |
Kasserine | N 35°10′03″ | E 8°50′11″ | 674 |
Extracts Preparation
In order to optimize the bioactive compounds extraction, the aerial parts of T. hirsuta were extracted by two different methods namely Soxhlet extraction and cold maceration.
Soxhlet Extraction
The plant materials were extracted successively using three different solvents with increasing polarity namely hexane, ethyl acetate and methanol. A total amount of 15 g of dried powdered were introduced into a cartridge and introduced inside a Soxhlet apparatus. Then, a volume of 150 ml of the extraction solvent was added to the solvent cup. Extraction was carried out with four cycles. Afterwards, the liquid extract was collected into a flask to remove the solvent.
Cold Maceration
The powdered plant materials were successively extracted with solvents of increasing polarity namely hexane, ethyl acetate and methanol. In the first step, an amount of 5 g of dried powdered was placed into an Erlenmeyer flask contained 50 ml of hexane and macerated for 24h under continuous agitation. Once the extraction process is finished, the mixture was thoroughly filtered using a filter paper and the solvent was removed using a rotary evaporated.
After each extraction methods, the crude extracts were weighted and kept in a dark flask until further experiment. The extraction yield for each extract was calculated using the formula cited below:
Where m: is the weight of residue in grams, M: is the weight of plant material in grams.
Estimation of Total Phenolics Content
The estimation of phenolic content of each extract was done by the Folin-Ciocalteu method as outlined by Ghazouani et al [17]. To perform this assay, 100 µL of each extract were mixed with 500 µL Folin Ciocalteu reagent (0.2 N) and left at room temperature in the darkness for 5 min. Then, a volume of 400 µL of sodium carbonate solution (75 g/L, prepared in water) was added subsequently. The mixture also obtained was thoroughly shaken and incubated for 15 minutes in the darkness before reading the absorbance at 765 nm. The Gallic Acid was used as standard to plot a calibration curve. The amounts of phenolics content were calculated according to the calibration curve and expressed as milligram of Gallic Acid Equivalents (GAE) per g of dry weight (mg GAE/g dw).
Estimation of total Flavonoids Content
The total flavonoids content in extract was estimated by the colorimetric aluminum chloride methodology as described by Sifaoui et al. [18]. In short, 250 µL of each extract were mixed with 1000 µL of water and 75 µL of a 15% sodium nitrite solution (NaNO2). The mixture was shaken and incubated for 6 minutes. 75 µL of aluminum chloride solution (AlCl3, 10%) were added subsequently. After 6 minutes of incubation, 1000 µL of sodium hydroxide solution (NaOH, 4%) were added. The mixture was adjusted to 2500 µL by adding distilled water and allowed to stand for 15 minutes. Afterwards, the absorbance was read at 510 nm against the prepared blank using a UV visible spectrophotometer. The total flavonoids content was calculated from the calibration curve prepared by quercetinas reference. The results were expressed in terms of milligram of quercetin equivalents per g of dry weigh (mg QE/g dw).
Free Radical Scavenging Activity
The free radical scavenging activity was tested using three different methods i.e. DPPH•, ABTS and FRAP.
DPPH. Radical Scavenging Activity]
The stable radical 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH•) was used to measure the free radical scavenging activity of T. hirsuta extracts by the procedure of Ghazouani et al. [17].
In summary, triplicates of 100 µL of each extract was mixed with 900 µL of freshly prepared methanolic DPPH• solution and the mixture was vigorously shaken. After 25 minutes of incubation in the darkness, the absorbance of the mixture was read at 524 nm against blank solution using a UV-vis spectrophotometer. The percentage of inhibition of the free radical scavenging activity of each extract was calculated came as:
%inhibition = (A ( black) – A ( sample) / A (black))* 100
Where A sample is the absorbance of sample with DPPH• solution and A blank is the absorbance of DPPH•. solution without the extract. Results were expressed as IC50 (mg/L), defined as the concentration of the test material required to scavenge 50% of DPPH• radicals which calculated from the inhibition percentage of radical scavenging activity. Ascorbic acid was used as a reference.
ABTS Radical Scavenging Activity
The ABTS•+ (2,2′-azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline- 6-sulphonate) radical cation scavenging assay was estimated based on the method outlined by Ghazouani et al. [17].
The ABTS• + solution was prepared using: 1 mL of 7 mM ABTS (in distilled water) was mixed with 1 ml of 2.45 mM potassium persulfate solution (K2S2O8, in distilled water). Prior to assay, the mixture was diluted in distilled water to give an absorbance ranging from 0.70 to 0.90. In this assay, about 100 µL of each extract at different concentration was taken in different test tubes and 900 µL of distilled water was added to each test tube. Afterwards, the mixture was vigorously shaken and allowed to stand for 6 min in the dark at ambient temperature. Then, Inhibition of ABTS•+ radical by the plant samples was measured at 734 nm using a UV-vis spectrophotometer. Results were expressed as IC50 (mg/L) and calculated with the same formula cited above in the DPPH• scavenging assay. Ascorbic acid was used as standard. Triplicate analysis were carried out for each sample
Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay
The ferric reducing ability of various T. hirsuta extracts was determined by the method outlined by Saoudi et al. [19]. Briefly, the FRAP reagent solution was freshly prepared by mixing 1 mL of 10 mM 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine (TPTZ) solution (in hydrochloric acid (40 mM))), 1 mL of 20 mM Iron(III) chloride (FeCl3) solution (in distilled water) and 10 mL of 300 mM acetate buffer solution (in distilled water, pH =3.6). Then, the mixture was shaken and warmed at 37 ºC. In order to perform this assay, 50 µL of each extract were added to 1500 µL of FRAP reagent solution and allowed to stand in the darkness for 30 minutes at 37 ºC. After that, ferric reducing ability of T. hirsuta extracts was measured at 595 nm. the results were expressed as FeSO4,7H2O equivalent mM per gram of Dry Extract (mM /g DE) using a calibration curve. Triplicate analysis were carried out for each sample.
Statistical Analysis
All results were expressed as means ± standard deviations and all measurements were done in triplicate. Statistical Analysis was carried out by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan multiple range test using IBM SPSS Statistics 21. The PCA and SCA were performed using XLSTAT.
Results and Discussion
Extraction Yields
Extraction of T. hirsuta aerial part, collected from four different regions in Tunisia, was carried out by two different extraction methods such as successive soxhlet extraction and cold maceration with solvents of increasing polarity: hexane, ethyl acetate and methanol. The extraction yield was expressed as percent (%) and summarized in Table 2.
Table 2: Extraction yield of T. hirsuta aerial parts by two different methods.
Regions | Samples | Extraction yield (%) | |
Soxhlet | Cold maceration | ||
Tunis | Hexane | 2.57 e | 0.61l |
Ethyl acetate | 2.35f | 1.83f | |
Methanol | 5.17d | 4.88b | |
Kasserine | Hexane | 2.07h | 0.77k |
Ethyl acetate | 1.77k | 1.52h | |
Methanol | 5.48c | 4.39c | |
Chebba | Hexane | 1.98i | 2.33e |
Ethyl acetate | 1.82j | 1.64g | |
Methanol | 8.11a | 4.02d | |
Fernana | Hexane | 2.3g | 1.38j |
Ethyl acetate | 1.54b | 1.41i | |
Methanol | 6.18b | 4.99a |
a-i: means within a column row with different letters were significantly different (ρ<0.05)
As shown in table 2, the yields of organic extracts prepared by cold maceration and soxhlet varied significantly (ρ < 0.05) from 0.61 to 8.11 %, depending on the extraction method, origin geographic and solvent. The yield percent of T. hirsuta extracts through successive soxhlet and maceration techniques at different polarities of solvent shows that the highest extraction yield was recovered with solvent methanol (4.02 to 8.11 %), followed by ethyl acetate (1.41 to 2.35 %) either through maceration or soxhlet, whereas, the lowest yield was recovered by hexane (0.61 to 2.57 %). We should notice that the different polarities of solvent affect the extraction yield. The increase of the solvent polarities induces the enhancement of the extraction yield significantly. Such variation can be explained by the simple fact that the chemical composition varied considerably according to the solvent polarities, which could be related to the abundance of the polar compounds present in various T. hirsuta extracts. Despite the different solvent used, the soxhlet extraction method found to have higher yield over than cold maceration method. This result might be justified by the different conditions used in both extraction methods especially temperature and duration of extraction. In the soxhlet process, it is necessary to work at high temperature to boil the solvent. Whereas, the cold maceration process was carried out at ambient temperature. Raising the temperature leads the improvement the process efficiency. As regards the geographic variation, it clearly appears that the yield varies from one region to another. In maceration, the methanol extract yields percentage were found to be in the following order: Fernana > Tunis > Kasserine > Chebba, whereas, in soxhlet extraction it was in the order of: Chebba > Fernana > Kasserine > Tunis. these findings show that the extraction yield is highly influenced by factors such as extraction methods, geographic origin and solvent. To our knowledge, there are no previous studies investigating the extraction yield of T. hirsuta
Chemical Composition of Various T. Hirsuta Extracts
The chemical composition namely phenolic, flavonoids and tannins of T. hirsuta extracts obtained by the two extraction methods was estimated and summarized in Table 2 which shows that the various extracts obtained from the aerial part of T. hirsuta are rich in phenolic compounds with amounts fluctuating between 29.37 ± 1.34 and 362.74 ± 3.49 mg EAG/g dw.
The content of polyphenols varies according to the polarities of solvent, extraction methods and geographical origin. In both extraction methods, the methanolic extract possess the highest total phenol contents (191.59 ± 2.09 to 362.74 ± 3.49 mg EAG/g dw), followed by the ethyl acetate (53.81 ± 2.19 to 165.47 ± 4.95 mg EAG /g dw). On the other hand, the hexane solvent weakly extracts the total phenolics content which proportions range from 29.37 ± 1.34 to 81.79 ± 0.43 mg EAG /g dw. Statistically the variation in the total phenolic content as a function of the type and the polarity of used solvents is significant (p <0.05). Such variation might be attributed by the solvent extractive capacity. Therefore, it is known that the phenolic compound was better extracted by polar solvent [20]. Furthermore, table 2 showed also that the total phenolic content of T. hirsuta extract reveals that the cold maceration technique was more efficient than the soxhlet process, which yielded higher polyphenol content. The comparison between the areas tested shows that the total phenolic content differs from one region to another regardless the type of solvent used. This suggests that the phenolic compounds extraction was very affected by several factors which can be climatic conditions, altitude, latitude, longitude and soil.
About the total flavonoid content, we can notice that the amount ranged quantitatively from 26.22 ± 6.06 to 163.64 ± 3.32 mg QE/g dw and from 47.61 ± 2.29 to 162.61 ±2.60 mg QE/g dw for soxhlet and maceration techniques, respectively. These results show that the maceration method obtained higher amount of flavonoids in comparison with soxhlet method with the only exception of Tunis methanol extract and Fernana hexane extract. The amount of total flavonoids varies considerably according to the solvents used and geographical origin as well as extraction methods. Statistically, the difference between the flavonoid contents as a function of region is significant. This can be related to the chemical composition which changes from one region to another regardless the extraction method.
In maceration, we observed that the extracts corresponding to Chebba region are richer in flavonoids, followed by extracts relating to the Kasserine region, then the extracts from Fernana region and finally we found the extracts of Tunis which contain the lowest amount. In soxhlet, the highest amount of flavonoids was found in methanol extract of Tunis, followed by Kasserine methanol extract and then Chebba methanol extract. As for the Fernana methanol extract, it has a lower flavonoid content. Regarding the solvent used for both extraction methods, it seems like that the methanol extracts gave the highest amount of flavonoids (from 88.76 ± 7.24 to 163.64 ± 3.32 mg QE/g dw (soxhlet) and from 144.32 ± 2.60 to 162.61 ±2.60 mg QE/g dw (maceration)), followed by ethyl acetate (from 30.45 ± 2.15 to 37.26 ± 0.51 mg QE/g dw (soxhlet) and from 47.61 ± 2.29 to 65.99 ±5.379 mg QE/g dw (maceration)), whereas, the lowest amount of flavonoids was obtained by hexane extract (from 26.22 ± 6.06 to 66.25 ± 5.17 mg QE/g dw (soxhlet) and from49.43 ± 1.55 to 57.62 ± 1.19 mg QE/g dw (maceration)). These results highlighting chemical differences between various extracts obtained in accordance with region, organic solvent and extraction method. This behavior is confirmed by scatter plot analysis (SCA) performed on the variability of polyphenol and flavonoids composition.
Figure 1: Biplot obtained from scatter plot illustrating separation of groups Click here to View figure |
As illustrated in Figure 1, this biplot allows us to classify the richness of extract in bioactive molecules according to their phenolic and flavonoid compounds.
Figure 1 revealed a variability among the extraction solvent used in relation to phenolics and flavonoids composition by showing clear two separated groups. The first one groups the hexane and ethyl acetate extracts obtained by both extraction methods, indicating that these extracts possess almost similar phenolic and flavonoids composition, with the exception of macerated Fernana ethyl acetate extract that contain a higher phenolic compound compared to extracts from the same group. The second group contains only the methanol extracts, showing the richness of these extracts in phenolic compounds, with the exception of macerated methanol extract corresponding to Chebba region that is far to the methanol extracts of the same group, which shows a difference in the chemical composition (mainly phenolic compounds). This allows us to make inferences towards the possible impact of regional factor and extraction solvent on phenolic compounds.
This phytochemical study showed that the various macerated extracts were richer in phenolic compounds than the extracts obtained by soxhlet, indicating that extraction methods had a significant impact on the bioactive molecule extraction. These data allow us to suggest that maceration method was more efficient to extract aerial parts of T. hirsuta. Although the cold maceration technique is one of the most used methods to extract a group of fragile molecules but it is time consuming. However, the soxhlet extraction method needed a high temperature to extract the bioactive substances, which could be influences on the quality of extracts causing thermal degradation. Previous studies showed that some thermolabile compounds may decompose in the soxhlet method [21-22] In fact, some phenolic compounds are thermo-sensitive mainly flavan-3-ol and derivatives as well as anthocyanin, which needed to be extracted under moderate temperature [23-24].
Only four studies in the literature reported the phenolic and flavonoids of T. hirsuta extracts prepared by cold maceration technique. Both Akrout et al (2011) and Trigui et al (2013) have found a greater phenolic content (345.2 mg GAE/g dry extract in 50:50 aqueous/ethanol extract and 147.6±1.8 to 6.1±1.5mg GAE/g dw, respectively) [9,13], whereas, Djeridane et al. (2006) and Amari et al (2014) have shown that the T. hirsuta aerial parts contain a small amount of total phenolic with a 6.81±0.4 mg GAE/g dw in 70:30 aqueous/ethanol extract and 147.6±1.8 to 6.1±1.5mg GAE/g dw in water extract [15-16]. About the flavonoid content a small amount were found by Akrout et al (2011) (36.6 mg RE/g extract in 50:50 aqueous/ethanol extract), Trigui et al. (39.3±2.4 to 15.3±0.2 mg QE/g dw), djeridane et al. (2006) (4.95±0.81 mg RE/g dw in 70:30 aqueous/ethanol extract) and Amari et al. (2014) (5.70±0.06 to 2.61±0.13 mg QE/g dw in water extract).
Table 3: Phytochemical composition from T. hirsuta extracts obtained by two different extraction methods.
Regions | Samples | Chemical composition | |||
Phenolics (GAE)* | Flavonoids (QE)* | ||||
Soxhlet | Cold maceration | Soxhlet | Cold maceration | ||
Tunis | Hexane | 43.40 ± 0.58h, A | 32.10 ± 0.43h, B | 37.95 ± 4.78e, A | 50.37 ± 1.19 f, g, A |
Ethyle acetate | 53.81 ± 2.19g, B | 77.30 ± 1.16f, A | 30.45 ± 2.15e, f, B | 47.61 ± 2.29 g, A | |
Methanol | 230.19 ± 4.03a, B | 256.07 ± 4.03b, A | 163.64 ± 3.32a, A | 144.32±2.60 a, B | |
Kasserine | Hexane | 40.51 ± 1.62h, A | 33.24 ± 1.09h, A | 26.22 ± 6.06f, A | 50.72 ± 2.73f, g, A |
Ethyle acetate | 59.14 ± 1.16f, A | 63.97 ± 2.09g, A | 31.83 ± 1.69e, f, B | 53.57 ± 1.79 e, f, A | |
Methanol | 206.70 ± 2.15b, B | 259.63 ± 3.17b, A | 119.47 ± 6.57b, A | 160.19 ±5.17 a, B | |
Chebba | Hexane | 38.70 ± 2.12h, A | 33.75 ± 1.37h, A | 35.45 ± 0.99e, B | 57.62 ± 1.19 e, A |
Ethyle acetate | 93.94 ± 1.0d, A | 102.29 ± 3.81e, A | 37.26 ± 0.51e, B | 65.99 ±5.379 d, A | |
Methanol | 208.35 ± 8.14b, B | 362.74 ± 3.49a, A | 91.52 ± 8.36c, B | 162.61 ±2.60 a, A | |
Fernana | Hexane | 29.37 ± 1.34i, B | 81.79 ± 0.43f, A | 66.25 ± 5.17dA | 49.43 ± 1.55 f, g, A |
Ethyle acetate | 82.89 ± 1.55e, B | 165.47 ± 4.95d, A | 31.05 ± 3.09e, f, B | 49.08 ± 2.15 f, g, A | |
Methanol | 191.59 ± 2.09c, B | 217.28 ± 4.59c, A | 88.76 ± 7.24c, B | 153.89 ± 2.60 b, A |
*: mg/g dw; ±: Standard deviation; GAE: Gallic Acid Equivalent; QE: Quercetin Equivalent; CE: Catechin Equivalent.
a-i: means within a column row with different letters were significantly different (ρ<0.05).
A-B: means within a row with different letters were significantly different (ρ<0.05).
Antioxidant Activity
To evaluate the antioxidant activities of the various extracts from T. hirsuta obtained by two different extraction methods, we used three different in vitro assays namely DPPH•, ABTS•+, and FRAP. In this study, the antioxidant activities were expressed as IC50 for DPPH• and ABTS•+ while FRAP results were expressed in terms of mM FeSO4/g dw. The results for DPPH•, ABTS•+, FRAP and standard antioxidant were summarized in Table 4.
As shown in Table 4, both IC50 values of DPPH• and ABTS•+ had wide variability among areas, extraction methods and solvent. The DPPH• radical-scavenging activity of various methanolic extracts obtained by cold maceration varied from 4.75 ± 0.07 to 15.86 ± 0.46 mg/L. In fact, they have significantly higher antioxidant activity than methanolic extracts obtained by soxhlet extraction with IC50 values ranged from 12.46 ± 1.85 to 17.82 ± 1.25 mg/L. Such variation demonstrated the impact of extraction methods on the antioxidant compounds extraction. Despite the difference of polarities of solvent used, these data indicated that the cold maceration process always gives extracts rich in antioxidant molecule. This can be explained by the difference of experimental conditions carried out in both extraction methods especially temperature and duration of extraction. Indeed, the temperature can cause thermal degradation of antioxidants.
In terms of the impact of geographical sampling location, the DPPH• radical-scavenging ability of the methanolic extract can be arranged for maceration in the following order Kasserine >Tunis >Chebba >Fernana. Whereas, for the soxhlet methods it was in the order of Tunis >Chebba >Fernana >Kasserine. This allows to deduce that the chemical composition varies from localities.
This result was correlated with ABTS•+ assay where ethyl acetate (31.35 ± 0.21 to 168.5 ± 2.12 mg/L) and methanolic (4.11± 0.10 to 10.33± 0.64 mg/L) extracts obtained by maceration methods were also found more active than ethyl acetate (65.25 ± 1.70 to 168 ±1 mg/L) and methanolic (9.53±0.11 to 20.87 ± 0.73 mg/L) extracts of soxhlet. Statistically, the variation of the antioxidant activity as a function of the extraction solvent used is highly significant (p <0.05). Comparing the different solvents, the methanolic extract also exhibited a stronger antioxidant properties, followed by ethyl acetate that possess a moderate activity for DPPH• and ABTS•+ assays. In contrast, the hexane extracts were not active for both extraction methods. The results obtained showed that the methanolic extracts present an antioxidant activity near to that found by standard antioxidant and especially in case of maceration extracts. All these results led us to note that the IC50 values obtained by both assays are in concordance where the methanolic extracts relative to the four regions exhibit a notable antioxidant effect with respect to the DPPH• and ABTS•+ radicals. From data illustrated in Table 4, it can be clearly noticed that the IC50 values relating to ABTS•+ assay are lower than those found by DPPH• assay. This variation can be related to the kinetics of reaction. In fact, reactions to the ABTS•+ test involve an electron transfer and occur at a faster rate, contrary to the DPPH• radical where the discoloration degree is due to the ability to give hydrogen of the test compounds [25].
In the case of FRAP assay, the values obtained ranged from 0,04 ± 0,005 to 1.59 ± 0.072 mM/g DE(maceration) and from 0.031 ± 0.007 to 2.153 ± 0.09 mM/g DE (soxhlet) according to origin geographic origin and solvent. Regarding the polarities of solvent, it is important to notice that the methanol extract possessed a higher activity, followed by ethyl acetate extract, whereas, the hexane extract presents a lower activity regardless to extraction method and region. As presented in Table 4, it can be clearly observed that the results were similar to those found by DPPH• and ABTS•+, where the maceration method (especially methanol extract)s was statistically more efficient for extraction antioxidant compounds except to the soxhlet methanol Tunis extract. The observed substantial antioxidant activity of the extracts could be explained by their richness in phenolic compounds.
According to the literature, these results are in agreement with data found by Amari et al. (2014), who revealed that the flower, leaf and steam extracts of T. hirsuta prepared by cold maceration have a greater antioxidant activity using three different methods DPPH•, ABTS•+and FRAP [16]. However, Akrout et al (2011) showed that the 50% aqueous ethanol extract obtained by cold maceration possessed a feeble DPPH activity (EC50=3.025 mg/mL) [9]. Additionally, Djeridane et al (2006) revealed a moderate ABTS scavenging activity in 70% aqueous ethanol extract with a value of 17.62 mmol TEAC/ g dw [15]. Another study performed by Trigui et al (2013) indicated a good DPPH scavenging activity in the acetone (EC50=39.2 µg/mL) followed by ethyl acetate (EC50=88.69 µg/mL) and water extracts (EC50=187.96 µg/mL) [13]. Our study is, to our knowledge, the first report on the antioxidant activity of T. hirsuta extracts obtained by soxhlet.
Table 4: Antioxidant activity (DPPH•, ABTS•+ and FRAP) of T. hirsuta extracts obtained by two different extraction methods
Regions | Samples | Antioxidant activities | |||||
DPPH• (mg/L) | ABTS•+ (mg/L) | FRAP (mM/g) | |||||
Soxhlet | Cold maceration | Soxhlet | Cold maceration | Soxhlet | Cold maceration | ||
Tunis | Hexane | > 200d, A | > 200f, A | > 200h, A | > 200c, d, A | 0.044 ± 0.007g, A | 0.040 ± 0.005e, A |
Ethyle acetate | > 200c, A | 195.25 ±1.70c, B | 168 ± 1g, A | 104 ±1.41b, c, B | 0.141 ± 0.001f, B | 0.18 ± 0.009c, d, A | |
Methanol | 12.46 ±1.85a, A | 4.97± 0.05a, A | 9.68± 0.09a, A | 4.45 ± 0.09a, B | 2.153 ± 0.09a, A | 1.49 ± 0.11a, B | |
Kasserine | Hexane | > 200d, A | > 200f, A | > 200j, A | > 200e, A | 0.038 ± 0.002g, B | 0.066 ± 0.003e, A |
Ethyle acetate | > 200c, A | > 200e, A | 124.25 ± 3.30f, B | 168.5 ± 2.12d, A | 0.136 ±0.009f, A | 0.177 ± 0.004c, d, A | |
Methanol | 17.82± 1.25a, A | 4.75 ±0.07a, B | 9.53 ± 0.11a, A | 4.11 ± 0.10a, B | 0.88 ± 0.059c, B | 1.59 ± 0.072a, A | |
Chebba | Hexane | > 200d, A | > 200f, A | > 200h, A | > 200e, A | 0.031± 0.007g, B | 0.08 ± 0.005e, d, A |
Ethyle acetate | > 200c, A | 198 ±1.73d, B | 74.65 ± 1.52e, A | 49.25 ± 1.76a, b, B | 0.175 ± 0.0005e, f, B | 0.21 ± 0.005c, A | |
Methanol | 15.9 ± 0.66a, A | 5.3± 0.26a, B | 20.87 ± 0.73d, A | 4.40 ± 0.08a, B | 0.80 ± 0.001d, A | 1.28 ± 0.17b, A | |
Fernana | Hexane | > 200e, A | > 200f, A | > 200i, A | > 200e, A | 0.048 ± 0.001g, A | 0.040 ± 0.005e, A |
Ethyle acetate | > 200b, A | > 200d, A | 65.25 ±1.70d, A | 31.35 ±0.21a, B | 0.197 ± 0.020e, A | 0.186 ± 0.021c, d, A | |
Methanol | 16.1 ±0.24a, A | 15.86± 0.46b, A | 15.7 ±0.55b, A | 10.33 ± 0.64a, B | 1.070 ± 0.02b, A | 1.508 ± 0.197a, A | |
Vitamin C | 3,54 ± 0,08 | 2.94 ± 0.04 | – |
±: Standard deviation; a-i: means within a column row with different letters were significantly different (ρ<0.05).
A-B: means within a row with different letters were significantly different (ρ<0.05).
Correlation Between Phytochemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity
The principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to evaluate the correlation between phytochemical composition and antioxidant activity. The results were presented in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Biplot obtained from PCA illustrating correlation between antioxidant activity and chemical composition mainly phenolic and flavonoid compounds. |
Analysis of the results demonstrated a higher correlation between the DPPH• and ABTS•+. Conversely, no positive correlation was observed between phenolic contents and their antioxidant power measured by DPPH• and ABTS•+. In fact, several parameters can be explained these results. The antioxidant radical scavenging capacity of various extracts could be justified by the presence of other bioactive molecules. On the other hand, the Frap results correlated well with phenolic and flavonoid compounds. Therefore, the highest Frap results were attributed by the presence of phenolic and flavonoid compounds.
Conclusion
The Present study describes the effect of extraction methods as well as the geographic sampling origin on the phytochemical content and antioxidant properties of extracts obtained. To the best of our knowledge, it was the first time that the T. hirsuta aerial part was extracted successively by soxhlet and cold maceration using hexane, ethyl acetate and methanol as solvents. Comparing the extraction methods, we have found that the cold maceration was more efficient than soxhlet to extract the phenolic compounds exhibiting a higher antioxidant property. Furthermore, it appears that the chemical composition differs quantitatively between geographical areas. In summary, our findings revealed that T. hirsuta aerial parts could be used as potential natural source of antioxidants. The aerial part of this plant show a potential as a therapeutic agent to treat or prevent against oxidative stress. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to identify bioactive substances, especially in macerated methanol extracts that possess a higher amount of phenolic compounds and a strong antioxidant activity.
References
- Michel,,Destandau, E., Le Floch, G., Lucchesi, M.E,, Elfakir, C., Antioxidant and phytochemical investigations of sea buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides L.) leaf. stem. root and seed. Food chem., 2012; 131: 754-760.
CrossRef - Michalak, A., Phenolic compounds and their Antioxidant Activity in Plants Growing under Heavy Metal Stress. Review. Polish of Environ. Stud.,2006; 15: 523-530.
- Safdar, M.N., Kausar, T., Jabbar, S., Mumtaz, A., Ahad, K., Saddozai, A.A., Extraction and quantification of polyphenols from kinnow (Citrus reticulate L.) peel using ultrasound and maceration techniques. Journal of food and drug analysis. 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2016.07.010.
CrossRef - Belwal, T., Bhatt, I.D., Rawal, R.S., Pande, V., Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) conditions using polynomial design for improving antioxidant phytochemicals in Berberis asiatica Roxb. Ex DC. Leaves. Crops Prod.,2016.
- Aspé, E., Fernández, K., The effect of different extraction techniques on extraction yield, total phenolic and anti-radical capacity of extracts from Pinus radiata Bark. Crops Prod.,2011. 34: 838-844.
CrossRef - Péres, V.F., Saffi, J., Melecchi, M.I. S., Abad, F.C., Jacques, R.A., Martinez, M.M., Oliviera, E.C., Caramao, E.B., Comparison of soxhlet, ultrasound-assisted and pressurized liquid extraction of terpenes. fatty acids and Vitamin E fromPiper gaudichaudianum Journal of chromatography A.2006; 1105: 115-118.
CrossRef - Murugan, R., Parimelazhagan, T., evaluation of different extraction methods for antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties from Osbeckia parvifolia Arn.–An in vitro approach. Journal of King Saud University-Science.,2014; 26: 267-275.
CrossRef - Le Floc’h, , Contribution à une étude ethnobotanique de la flore Tunisienne´, Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la recherche Scientifique, Tunis, Tunisia (1983).
- Akrout,, Gonzalez, L.A., El Jani, H., Madrid, P.C., Antioxidant and antitumor activities of Artemisia campestris and Thymelaea hirsuta from southern Tunisia. Food Chem. Toxicol.,2011; 49: 342-349.
CrossRef - Kawano,, Matsuyama, K., Miyamae, Y., Shinmoto, H., Kchouk, M.E., Morio, T., Shigemori, H., Isoda, H., Antimelanogenesis effect of Tunisian herb Thymelaea hirsuta extract on B16 murine melanoma cells. Exp Dermatol. ,2007 ; 16 : 977–984.
CrossRef - Bnouham ,, Merhfour, F.Z., Legssyer, A., Mekhfi, H., Maallem, S., Ziyyat, A., Antihyperglycemic activity of Arbutus unedo. Ammoide spusilla and Thymelaea hirsuta. Pharmazie,2007; 62: 630–632.
- El Amrani, F., Rhallab, A., Alaoui, T., El Badaoui, K., Chakir, S., Hypoglycemic effect of Thymelaea hirsuta in normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Med. Plant. Res.,2009; 3: 625-629.
- Trigui,, Ben Hsouna, A., Tounsi, S., Jaoua, S., Chemical composition and evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Tunisian Thymelaea hirsuta with special reference to its mode of action. Ind. Crops Prod., 2013; 41: 150-157.
CrossRef - Bnouham, M., Benalla, W., Bellahcen, S., Ziyyat, H.Z., Mekhfi, H., Aziz, M., Legssyer, A., Antidiabetic and antihypertensive effect of a polyphenol-rich fraction of Thymelaea hirsuta L. in a model of neonatal streptozotocin-diabetic and NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester-hypertensive rats. diabetes.,2012; 4: 307-320.
- Djeridane, Yousfi M., Nadjemi B., Boutassouna D., Stocker P., Vidal N., Antioxidant activity of some Algerian medicinal plants extracts containing phenolic compounds. Food. Chem.,2006; 97: 654–660.
CrossRef - Amari,O., Bouzouina, M., Berkani, A., Lotmani, B., Phytochemical screening and antioxidant capacity of the aerial parts of Thymelaea hirsuta L. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis.,2014; 4: 104-109.
CrossRef - Ghazouani, N., Abderrabba M., Bouajila J., Teucrium ramosissimum (Lamiaceae): Volatile Composition. Seasonal Variation. and Pharmaceutical Activity. Bioanalytical., 2016; 49:1258-1271.
CrossRef - Sifaoui, I., Chammem, N., Abderrabba, M., Mejri, M., Optimization of phenolic compounds extraction from olive leaves using experimental design methodology. Mater. Environ. Sci.,2016; 7: 1119-1127.
- Saoudi, S., Chammem, N., Sifaoui, I., Jimenez, I.J., Lorenzo-Morales, J., Pinero, J.E., Bouassida-Beji, M., Hamdi, M., Bazzocchi, I.L., Combined effect of canosol, rosmaniric acid and thymol on the oxidative stability of soybean oil using a simplex centroid misture design. J Sci Food Agri., 2016.
- Pinelo,, Rubilar, M., Jerez, M., Sineiro, J., Nunez, M.J., Effect of solvent, Temperature, and solvent-to-solid ratio on the total phenolic content and antiradical activity of extracts from different components of grape pomace. J. Agric. Food Chem.,2005; 53: 2111–2117.
CrossRef - Murugan,, Parimelazhagan, T., Comparative evaluation of different extraction methods for antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties fromOsbeckia parvifolia Arn. – An in vitro approach. Journal of king Saud University-Science.,2014; 26: 267-275.
- Wan,, Weller, C.L., Recent advances in extraction of nutraceuticals from plants. Food Sci. Technol.,2006; 17: 300–312.
- Li,, Zhang, Z., Xue, J., Cui, L., Hou, T., Li, X., Chen, T., Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds, antioxidants and rosmarinic acid from perilla leaves using response surface methodology. Food Sci. Technol.,2016; 36: 686-693.
CrossRef - Silva,M., da-Silva, S.J., Pena, R.S., Rogez, H., A combined approach to optimize the drying process of flavonoid-rich leaves (Inga edulis) using experimental design and mathematical modelling. Food and bioproducts Processing., 2011; 89: 39-46.
CrossRef - Naik,H., Priyadarsini, K.I., Hari, M., Free radical scavenging reactions and phytochemical analysis of triphala. an ayurvedic formulation. Curr. Sci., 2006; 90: 1100–1105.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.