Volume 17, number 1
 Views: (Visited 277 times, 2 visits today)    PDF Downloads: 664

Hajare S, Ingole R. S, Sunidhi, Kotagiri R, Ganguly B. Evaluation of Acute Oral Toxicity of a Polyherbal Liver Tonic for Poultry. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2020;17(1).
Manuscript received on : 02-03-2020
Manuscript accepted on : 10-01-2020
Published online on:  --

Plagiarism Check: Yes

Reviewed by: Prof. Sameh orcid  

Second Review by: Arpita Roy orcid publons

Final Approval by: Hesham Ali El- Enshasy orcid publons

How to Cite    |   Publication History    |   PlumX Article Matrix

Evaluation of Acute Oral Toxicity of a Polyherbal Liver Tonic for Poultry

Sunil Hajare1, Ranjit Suresh Ingole2, Sunidhi3, Ravikanth Kotagiri3 and Bhaskar Ganguly3*

1Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, PGIVAS, Akola, India, 444104

2Department of Veterinary Pathology, PGIVAS, Akola, India, 444104

3Research and Development Unit, Ayurvet Limited, Baddi, India, 173205.

Corresponding Author E-mail : clinical01@ayurvet.in

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bbra/2813

ABSTRACT: The current study was designed to evaluate the acute oral toxicity potential of Superliv Gold liquid (M/s Ayurvet Limited, Baddi, India) according to OECD 423 guidelines. Superliv Gold liquid is a polyherbal hepatoprotective and hepatoregenerative liver tonic for poultry. Nine female Swiss albino mice were used for the study. Each animal served as its own control. Following the oral administration of the test substance, the animals were observed for manifestation of toxic effects and deaths. No toxic effects or mortalities were observed. The estimation of biochemical parameters (AST, ALT, ALP and creatinine) and histopathological studies also did not reveal any significant findings. Hence, Superliv Gold liquid was found to be safe for use.

KEYWORDS: Acute Oral Toxicity; Limit Test; OECD 423; Safety; Superliv Gold Liquid

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Hajare S, Ingole R. S, Sunidhi, Kotagiri R, Ganguly B. Evaluation of Acute Oral Toxicity of a Polyherbal Liver Tonic for Poultry. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2020;17(1).

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Hajare S, Ingole R. S, Sunidhi, Kotagiri R, Ganguly B. Evaluation of Acute Oral Toxicity of a Polyherbal Liver Tonic for Poultry. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2020;17(1). Available from: https://bit.ly/2yv0ZTG

Introduction

Liver is an important organ involved in a number of digestive, metabolic and productive activities regulating growth and productivity in poultry. Being the central organ for various activities, it is highly vulnerable to diseases. Particularly in broilers, the liver has to cope with various situations including high energy diet, use of coccidiostats and chemotherapeutic agents, posing risks to health and create situations of difficult prognosis. Researchers are actively looking for viable alternative to replace antibiotics due to ban on their use and increasing concerns over the rise of antimicrobial resistance. One class of such alternatives is herbs and medicinal plants. Herbal liver tonics act by protecting the liver from toxins and stimulating the liver function and, thus, enhance growth and production performance. Superliv Gold liquid contains herbs viz. Andrographis paniculata, Azadirachta indica, and Boerhaavia diffusa possessing hepatoprotective, choleretic, immunomodulatory, immunostimulatory and free radical scavenging activities. Superliv Gold liquid may also act as a depurative, enhancing erythropoiesis and immune system1,2. Superliv Gold liquid is recommended for offsetting the damaging effects of aflatoxins, restoring reduced feed intake, for improving liver functions, and for better feed utilization, growth and production. In a study, Superliv Gold liquid has been found to improve feed efficiency, body weight, breast muscle mass and reduced fat pad size3 which suggests an enhancement of muscle protein synthesis and reduction of fat deposition through inhibition of lipogenesis or increase of lipolysis process4. The present study aimed at determining the acute oral toxicity potential of Superliv Gold liquid.

Material and Methods

The animals for the current study were procured from CPCSEA-registered breeding source viz. laboratory animal resource section of Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, PGIVAS, Akola. Nine healthy, adult, nulliparous and non-pregnant female Swiss albino mice (20-25g) were used. Animals were kept in the cages for five days for acclimatization. The animals were fasted over-night, food but not water was withheld for 3-4 hours. Following the period of fasting, the animals were weighed and the test substance was administered orally. The animals were identified by appropriate means. The number of animals per cage was kept at three for clear observation of each animal; housing conditions were conventional. The ambient temperature was 25°C and relative humidity of 70%. The animals were exposed to 12 hour light-dark cycle and provided with standard pelleted diet and water ad lib5. After the administration of the test substance @ 300 mg/Kg (P.O.) in normal saline and 2000 mg/Kg with maximum volume 2 mL/ 100 g body weight, food was withheld for 1-2 hours. The animals were observed for 24 h, then for further 14 days for manifestation of toxic effects and deaths; LD50 value was also estimated. The observations included changes in skin, fur and eyes; and changes in respiratory, circulatory, CNS, autonomic, somatic activity and behavior. Clinical signs like muscular tremors, convulsions, salivation, diarrhea, lethargy, sleep, and coma, if any, observed during study period were recorded.

Results and Discussion

Individual body weights of mice were recorded on days 0, 7 and 14 of the study and body weights in both the groups (I and II) continued to increase throughout the study period (Table 1).

Table 1: Individual body weights of experimental mice

Formulation and Dose Mice No Body Weight (g) on Day
0 7 14
Superliv Gold liquid @ 300 mg/Kg b.wt. orally

(Group I)

1 21 23 25
2 20 23 25
3 24 26 27
Mean±SE 21.67±1.52 24.00±1.26 25.6±0.84
Superliv Gold liquid @ 2000 mg/Kg b.wt. orally

(Group II)

1 22 23 25
2 21 23 24
3 25 26 28
4 20 23 25
5 22 23 25
6 24 25 26
Mean±SE 22.3±0.76 23.83±0.54 25.50±0.56

No mortality was observed throughout the period of observation. In the six mice receiving the limit dose of Superliv Gold liquid at 2000 mg/Kg, i.e. the maximum dose which can be administered by oral route, no mortality occurred and hence, the LD50 was beyond this limit. Similarly, no abnormal symptoms, including lethargy, tremor, abdominal breathing, piloerection were observed up to 14 days of Superliv Gold liquid administration. Necropsy on day 14 did not show any remarkable findings in the gross or microscopic appearance of liver, kidney, spleen, heart, lungs, and genital organs in any of the animals. Pooled serum samples were analyzed in triplicate for AST, ALT, ALP and creatinine and all were within their normal ranges (Table 2).

Table 2: Biochemical findings in experimental mice

Dose AST (IU/L) ALT (IU/L) ALP (IU/L) Creatinine (mg/dL)
300 mg/Kg 71.93 82.86 89.53 0.77
2000 mg/Kg 86.73 106.5 97.96 0.49

Superliv Gold liquid contains herbs viz. Andrographis paniculata, Azadirachta indica, and Boerhaavia diffusa, that fall under the category of Generally Regarded As Safe (GRAS). A composition based on these GRAS constituents is least likely to be toxic in practical doses. Due to the presence of multiple active ingredients, Superliv Gold liquid may exert multifarious benefits on animals, including the stimulation of their growth, performance; thereby improving digestion, body weight and feed efficiency.

Conclusion

Superliv Gold liquid did not produce acute oral toxicity, evident as absence of mortality or any toxic clinical symptoms, when administered up to limit dose (2000mg/Kg) in mice. Based on this study, the formulation was found safe for oral use.

Conflict of Interest

Sunidhi, R. Kotagiri, and B Ganguly are employed by M/s Ayurvet Limited that commercially manufactures and sells Superliv Gold liquid. The authors undertake that the nature of this affiliation did not influence the outcomes of the study in any manner.

References

  1. Mishra S. K, Sangwan N. S, and Sangwan R. S. Plant Review Andrographis paniculata (Kalmegh): A Review. Pharmacog. Rev., 2007; 2: 283-298.
  2. Manu K. A. and Kuttan G. Immunomodulatory activities of Punarnavine, an alkaloid from Boerhaavia diffusa. Immunotoxicol., 2009; 31: 377-387.
    CrossRef
  3. Flees J, Greene E, Ganguly B, and Dridi S. Phytogenic feed-and water-additives improve feed efficiency in broilers via modulation of (an)orexigenic hypothalamic neuropeptide expression. Neuropeptides, 2020; doi:10.1016/j.npep.2020.102005.
    CrossRef
  4. Orlowski S, Flees J, Greene E. S, Ashley D, Lee S, Yang F. L, Owens C. M, Kidd M, Anthony N. and Dridi S. Effects of phytogenic additives on meat quality traits in broiler chickens. J. Ani. Sci., 2018; 96: 3757-3767.
    CrossRef
  5. OECD Test 423: Acute oral toxicity-acute toxic class method. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals (section 4: health effects) 1. 2001; 14.
(Visited 277 times, 2 visits today)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.