Volume 2, number 1
 Views: (Visited 454 times, 1 visits today)    PDF Downloads: 1008

Boboye B. Antibacterial Effect of Capsicum annum on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia 2003;2(1)
Manuscript received on : 
Manuscript accepted on : 
Published online on:  07-01-2016

Plagiarism Check: Yes

How to Cite    |   Publication History    |   PlumX Article Matrix

Antibacterial Effect of Capsicum annum on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus

B. Boboye

Department of Microbiology, Federal University of Technology, P. M. B. 704, Akure, Ondo State (Nigeria)

ABSTRACT: Studies on extract of Capsicum annum (red or sweet pepper) were carried out to assess its inhibitory effect on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. This was done by preparing crude extract of the pepper with sterile distilled water. The microbes were treated with the extract by agar diffusion and tube dilution methods. The crude extract showed considerable inhibitory effect on the bacteria with 16 mm and 24 mm diameters in the zones of inhibition for P. aeruginosa and S. aureus at 24 hr of incubation respectively. At 48 hr of incubation, the diameter in the area of growth inhibition for S. aureus decreased to 11 mm and that of P. aeruginosa increased to 21 mm. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of the pepper were 335 mg/ml and 402 mg/ml for P. aeruginosa and S. aureus respectively.

KEYWORDS: Antibacterial activity; Capsicum annuum; P. aeruginosa; S. aureus

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Boboye B. Antibacterial Effect of Capsicum annum on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia 2003;2(1)

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Boboye B. Antibacterial Effect of Capsicum annum on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia 2003;2(1). Available from: https://www.biotech-asia.org/?p=3426

Introduction

Capsicum annum (red or sweet pepper), a red pod-like berry fruit, like other Capsicum species (chillies) has many uses all over the world. The pepper is nutritious. A 100 g of it contains protein (2%), fat (0.8%), carbohydrate (10%), fibre (2.6%), calcium (29 mg), phosphorus (61 mg), iron (2.6 mg), ß-carotene equi. (180 µg), thiamine (0.12 mg), riboflavin (0.15 mg), niacin (2.2 mg), ascorbic acid (140 mg), water (86 ml) and calories (48 joules)¹. It is mainly used in raw, ripe and dried forms for flavouring stew, curries, chutney and vegetable dishes or salads. Its cooked leaves are eaten raw. Fine powder of the chilli is sold as Cayenne pepper and the extracts have many pharmaceutical uses. The red pepper is a pungent stimulant, stomachic and carminative. In small doses it helps in the secretion of saliva and gastric juice, and also induces peristaltic movements2,3. Lowenfeld and Lowenfeld4 reported that C. annum is used for the treatment of diarrhoea, dropsy, toothache, relaxed throat, gout and as liniment.

Little or no information is available on medicinal use of the plant in Nigeria. In a preliminary research study carried out on antibacterial activities of some plants used as condiments and spices in Nigeria, it was shown that the C. annum highly inhibited the growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli5. In this study antagonistic effect of the sweet pepper’s extract was examined on Staphylococcus aureus and P. aeruginosa. In an attempt to quantify the effective dose of the red pepper against Gram positive and Gram negative human pathogenic bacteria, minimum inhibitory concentrations of the C. annum for P. aeruginosa and S. aureus were determined.

Materials and Methods

Sources of Materials

Fresh Capsicum annum (Sweet pepper) was obtained from the “Oba” market in Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria. The human pathogenic bacterial strains: Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus were provided by University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.

Preparation of Extract

A blender was surface-sterilized by pouring absolute ethanol into it. It was left for 30 min., drained and allowed to dry. Raw extract was made by grinding 100 g of the sweet pepper in 150 ml sterile distilled water. Crude extract was prepared by filtering the raw extract through a sterile sieve with pore size of 0.1 mm.

Agar Diffusion Test

An aliquot (0.5 ml) of 18 hr old nutrient broth culture (OD600, 0.45) of each of the bacteria was spread on nutrient agar. An hole was bored into the agar with 14 mm cork borer and filled with the crude extract. Control plate contained sterile distilled water instead of the extract. Another control was set up as the test but lacked the bacteria. All plates were incubated at 37oC for 24 to 48 hr and observed for clear zone which indicates sensitivity of the test organisms to the pepper. Degree of sensitivity was determined by measuring the diameter in the zone of inhibition in millimetre. This procedure was carried out three times.

Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration

This test was carried out by tube dilution method with crude sweet pepper extract using P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. A 0.5 ml of 18 hr P. aeruginosa (20 x 107 cells) and S. aureus (26 x 107 cells) were added to peptone water contained in a test tube. Crude extract was added to obtain varying final concentrations of 0.067, 0.134, 0.201, 0.268, 0.335, 0.402, 0.469 and 0.536. Two sets of control tubes were made up as the test tubes. A set of the control tubes contained nutrient broth substituted for the bacterium and the other set lacked the extract replaced with sterile nutrient broth. All tubes were incubated at 37°C for 24 hr. Transparency at the top of the liquid in the tube was recorded as inhibition. Aliquot (0.1 ml) of this liquid was inoculated into nutrient agar in order to confirm death of the bacterial cells. Concentration of the sweet pepper extract in tube corresponding to where complete death of the organism started was noted as the point of minimum inhibitory concentration.

The above described procedure used for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test was repeated to determine the specific MIC for each of the bacteria with final extract concentrations of 0.268, 0.282, 0.294, 0.308, 0.321 and 0.335 g/ml for P. aeruginosa and 0.335, 0.348, 0.363, 0.377, 0.391 and 0.402 g/ml for S. aureus.

Results and Discussion

S. aureus was more sensitive than P. aeruginosa to the crude sweet pepper extract. Zone diameter of growth inhibition of the extract was 24 mm for S. aureus and 16 mm for P. aeruginosa at 24 hr of incubation. At 48 hr of incubation, zone diameter of growth inhibition for the P. aeruginosa increased to 21 mm and that of S. aureus decreased to 11 mm. This suggests that the C. annum is bacteriostatic on S. aureus and bacteriocidal or bacteriolytic in action against P. aeruginosa. The antibacterial activity of the pepper is due to the presence of capsine in its flesh, seeds and placenta which also accounts for its strong taste6.

In the tube dilution MIC test, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus appeared susceptible to the crude sweet pepper extract at the minimum inhibitory concentrations of 335 mg/ml and 402 mg/ml for the former and latter bacteria respectively.

The higher concentration of the extract for its antagonistic activity against S. aureus than that of the second bacterium could be because the pepper was bacteriostatic on it. However, these concentrations are higher than the standard value (30 mg/ml) recommended for MIC and those of many antibiotics such as gentamycin, tetracycline, erythromycin, ampicillin, tobramycin, kanamycin and chloramphenicol commonly used against these two organisms7. This could be attributed to the reason that the sweet pepper is a plant containing other consitituents while the conventional antibiotics are purified substances synthesized by microorganisms wholly or partially from chemical compound which at low concentrations inhibit the growth of other microbes8.

Acknowledgement

I am grateful to Omotayo Akinola, Fred Akharaiyi for technical assistance and Department of Microbiology, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria for instrumentation and provision of materials.

References

  1. Tindal, H. D., Vegetables in the tropics. Macmillan Press Ltd., London. 347- 349 (1983)
  2. Dutta, A. C., Botany for Degree Students. 2nd ed, Oxford University Press, London. 704 (1968)
  3. Dupriez, H. and De Leener, P., African Gardens and Orchards: Growing vegetables and fruits, 1st ed. Macmillan Publishers Ltd., London. 333 (1989)
  4. Lowenfeld, G. E. and Lowenfeld, C., The encyclopedia of alternative medicine and self-help,
    Edited by M. Hutchison Group Ltd., London. 102-103 (1978)
  5. Boboye B., Babatunde T. and Onoriode A., Antibacterial Activities of Some Plants used as Condiments and Spices in Nigeria. Journal of Technoscience, (Submitted, 2003)
  6. Irvine, F. R., West African Crops, Oxford University Press. 111-112 (1961)
  7. Brock, T. D., Smith, D. W. and Madigan, M. T., Biology of Microorganisms, Prentice-Hall International, New Jersey. 249 (1984)
  8. Pelczar, M. J., Chan, E. C. and Kreig, N. R., Microbiology: Concept and Application, McGraw- Hill International. 578, 683, 694 (1989)
(Visited 454 times, 1 visits today)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.