Volume 7, number 2
 Views: (Visited 197 times, 1 visits today)    PDF Downloads: 1015

Kumari S, Rao M. R, Reddy I. B, Rao V. R. Study on Radical Scavenging Activity and Analysis of Bioactive Compounds in Selected Indian Medicinal Plants. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2010;7(2)
Manuscript received on : August 04, 2010
Manuscript accepted on : September 15, 2010
Published online on:  28-12-2010
How to Cite    |   Publication History    |   PlumX Article Matrix

Study on Radical Scavenging Activity and Analysis of Bioactive Compounds in Selected Indian Medicinal Plants  

Seema kumari2*, M. Rama Rao1, I. Bhaskar Reddy1 and V. Rama Rao2*

1Department of Biochemistry, College of Science, Gitam University, Rushikonda, Visakhapatnam - 45 India. *

2MVR.P.G. College, Visakhapatnam - 45 India.

Corresponding Author E-mail: seemakumarisingh@gmail.com

ABSTRACT: Antioxidant therapy promises effective role in treatment of diseases caused due to free radicals. The present study is to examine the antioxidant potential of selected medicinal plants namely Nardostachys jatamansi, Swertia chirayita, Glycyrrhiza glabra, Zingiber officinale, Carum carvi, Trachyspermum ammi, Madhucana indica ,Berberries aristata, Fenniculum vulgare, Myristica fragans. Ethanolic extract were used for analysis. B.aristata showed highest radical scavenging effect on the stable DPPH. radical with IC50 (95.9%) followed by M. fragrans with IC50 (91.8%) which is high in comparison with synthetic antioxidant BHT (74.8%). Superoxide radical scavenging activity, hydroxyl radical scavenging activities, Total antioxidant power, invitro lipid peroxidation were evaluated using concentration range of 1gm,5gm,10gm,15gm,20gm/100ml .Antioxidant activity is reported due to presence of bioactive compounds hence analysed presence of phenols, flavonoids, alkaloids.

KEYWORDS: DPPH radicals; in vitro lipid peroxidation; BHT; Phenols

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Kumari S, Rao M. R, Reddy I. B, Rao V. R. Study on Radical Scavenging Activity and Analysis of Bioactive Compounds in Selected Indian Medicinal Plants. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2010;7(2)

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Kumari S, Rao M. R, Reddy I. B, Rao V. R. Study on Radical Scavenging Activity and Analysis of Bioactive Compounds in Selected Indian Medicinal Plants. Biosci Biotech Res Asia 2010;7(2). Available from:https://www.biotech-asia.org/?p=9454

Introduction

Medicinal plants have been used for centuries as remedies for human diseases because they contain components of therapeutic value. Free radical role in causing diseases can be compared with role of microorganism in infections disease (1).  Reactive oxygen species are derived from the metabolism of oxygen, this includes superoxide radical (O2-), hydroxyl radical (OH.-) and hydrogen peroxide (2, 3). Oxidation process is important in producing free radicals in living system (4). In cellular oxidation reactions superoxide transformed into other potentially harmful free radicals causing peroxidation of lipid, protein and DNA damage, (5).Oxidation process can be augmented by antioxidants defence system by scavenging free radicals giving maximum intracellular protection. Due to depletion of natural antioxidants in different maladies, consumption of antioxidants as free radical scavengers has become necessary, inspite of having synthetic antioxidants (6, 7).

Many plant species have been investigated in search for novel antioxidants in the recent time (8,9) but demand still persist .In particular, despite widespread of medicinal plants, the literature supports the importance of medicinal properties of these plants. N. jatamansi (Valerianaceae), the dried rhizomes are known as stimulants, bitter tonic. (10). S.chirayita (Gentianaceae), stem has antipyretic, (11). G. glabra (Leguminosae) roots used to relieve coughs, gastric inflammation (12). Z. officinale (Zingiberacea) roots used as cardiac stimulant, (13). C.carvi (Apiaceae) seeds used in stomach disorders to relieve pain, scabies, (14). T. ammi (Apiaceace) seeds have platelet aggregation inhibitory action .M. indica (Sapotaceae) fruits are used to cure piles, bronchitis. B.aristata (Berberidaceae) roots used  in piles, pain reliever, antituberculosis. F.vulgare (Umbelliferae) seeds are used in bronchitis,. M.fragans (Myristicaceae) seeds anti-platelet aggregation, anti-inflammatory activities.

Materials and Methods

1, 1, Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl, 2, 4, 6-tripyridyl-s-trizine(TPTZ) purchased from sigma chemicals co. The other chemicals and solvents used in the present study were of analytical grade obtained from local supplier in pure quality .The plant material were purchased from local supplier.

Preparation of plant extract

The plant material were thoroughly cleaned, shade dried and coarse powdered in a mechanical blender. The powder was successively ethanol, by soxhlet extraction method run for 48hrs. Concentration ranging from was prepared (1gm, 5gm, 10gm, 15gm, and 20gm/100ml).

DPPH radical scavenging activity

DPPH scavenging activity was measured by the method of (Cuedet   etal, 1997). To 5 ml of a methanolic solution of DPPH (0.004%), 50µl of test extract (1gm, 5gm, 10gm, 15gm, and 20gm/100ml) were added. BHT was used as standard, for control test extract were replaced by ethanol. The reaction mixture were incubated for 30 minutes at 370C, absorbance was taken at 517nm using Systronic UV-visible spectrophotometer The IC50 of inhibition was calculated from following equation A0-Ax100/A0. Therefore, A0 is absorbance of control and A is absorbance of sample. IC50 value denotes the concentration of sample required to scavenge 50% of free radicals.

Superoxide radical scavenging activity

The superoxide radical scavenging activity was measured by (Beauchamp and Fedovich 1976) method. Superoxide anion were generated in non-enzymatic  hydroxylamine (HA)-EDTA system through the reaction of HA, EDTA and oxygen .It was assayed by reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium .The superoxide anion were generated in reaction mixture containing 1.0ml of sodium carbonate (125mM),0.4ml NBT (24µM) and 0.2 ml of EDTA(0.1mM).The reaction was initiated by adding 0.4ml of hydroxylamine(1mM) and 0.5ml of plant extracts of different concentrations  , in control test extract were replaced by ethanol. After 5 minutes of incubation at room temperature, the absorbance was measured at 560nm. The IC50 of inhibition was calculated from following equation. A0-Ax100/A0.

Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity

The ability of sample to inhibit hydroxyl radical mediated peroxidation was measured by (Kunchandy and Rao, 1990) with some adaptations. The reaction mixture contained 100µl of plant extracts 500µl of (0.6mM) of deoxyribose in phosphate buffer (20mM, pH 7.4), 500 µl ferric chloride (0.1mM) 500µl EDTA(0.1mM) ,500µl of ascorbic acid (0.1mM) and 100µl of H 2O 2  (1mM) and 800µl of phosphate buffer so that the final volume is 3ml. After incubation  for 1hr at 37 0C add 1.0 ml of TCA(2.8%) and 1.0ml of (thiobarbituric acid) TBA (1%) place the reaction mixture in water bath for 20 minutes at 100 0C cool and centrifuge if necessary , the absorbance was measured at  532 nm. BHT was used as standard, in control test extract were replaced by ethanol. The IC50 of inhibition was calculated from following equation A0-Ax100/A0.

Invitro inhibition of lipid peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation induced by FeSO 4 –ascorbate system in sheep liver homogenate by method of (Bishayee and Balasubramaniyam, 1971) and the formed thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) was estimated by (Ohkawa etal1979). The liver was obtained from slaughter house   collected and washed number of times with normal saline To 0.1ml of sheep liver homogenate in (25%) in Tris-HCl buffer (40mM, pH 7.0 ; KCl (30mM);0.16mM of ferrous ammonium sulphate , 0.06mM ascorbic acid), add 0.4ml of plant extract (1gm,5gm,10gm,15gm,20gm/100ml)  and incubate for 1hr at 37 0C , remove 0.4ml of the mixture and add 0.2 ml of (8.1%) SDS, 1.5 ml of (20%) acetic acid, 1.5ml of (0.8%) TBA and incubate in water bath for 1hr at 92 0C, cool and add 1mlof distilled water and 5ml of butanol: pyridine (15:1) mixture. Shake the reaction mixture and centrifuge at 4000 rpm for 15 minutes and the absorbance of organic layer was measured at 532 nm.

Total antioxidant by FRAP method

The total antioxidant power was determined by the modified FRAP (ferric chloride reducing ability of plasma) method.  by (Benzie and Strain method, 1996) In this assay FRAP reagent was prepared by adding 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-trizine(TPTZ) and ferric chloride forming Fe +3 –TPTZ complex is reduced Fe +2 –TPTZ complex which gives an intense blue colour at 595nm .The calibration curve was prepared using FeSO4 with concentration ranging from100-1000(M.  To 1.5ml of FRAP reagent (2, 4, 6-tripyridyl-s-triazine and ferric chloride) add 50(l of plant extracts.  The absorbance was measured at 593 nm. The results were expressed as Ascorbic acid Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (AEAC) in terms of mM.

Analysis of bioactive compounds

Presence of major bioactive compounds were analysed by qualitative test for alkaloids (Hagers test, Mayers test, Wagners test), flavonoids (Pew’s,Shinoda test), phenolics (ferric chloride test).

Statistical analysis

The values are expressed as the means + S.D of three determinants.

Results and discussion

The etiology of various human diseases as arteriosclerosis, cancer, neurodegenerative disease has shown the involvement of ROS (4). Evidences say that antioxidants may overcome these deleterious consequences of oxidative stress. Free radical scavenging activity was evaluated by DPPH free radical scavenging   method. Ethanol due to high polarity extracts most of the compounds hence exhibit high activity. Increasing concentration of extracts ranging from (1gm, 5gm, 10gm, 15gm, 20gm/100ml) were analysed to find out any proportionality in activity with increase in concentration.  The DPPH assay measured hydrogen atom (or one electron) donating activity and hence provided an evaluation of antioxidant activity due to free radical scavenging. Plant extracts showed decrease in absorbency with a stable DPPH.-  radicals which indicate a high level of radical scavenging  activity. Table: 1 it infers that B.aristata and M.fragans has shown highest radical scavenging activity in dose dependent order S. chirayita  Z.officinale C. carvi F. vulgares difference in result did not contributed satisfactory activity. Superoxide is biologically important as it can for potent oxidative species, which can damage cellular components . The results are shown in table:-2 gives % of inhibition which is concentration dependent and N.jatamansi, M.fragans showed almost similar pattern highest activity shown by B.aristata BHT (1mg/ml) a synthetic antioxidant used as standard for comparision Hydroxyl radical is very reactive and can be generated in biological cells through Fenton reaction radical scavenging activity .Table: 3 showed 97% Radical scavenging by B.aristata which is significantly high. Initiation of lipid peroxidation by ferrous takes place through hydroxyl radical by Fenton reaction. The degree of inhibition of FeSO4 induced lipid peroxidation in sheep liver homogenate in a function of dose dependent. The inhibition could be due to scavenging hydroxyl radical or superoxide radical or by chelating iron Hydroxyl radicals can interact with membrane lipids to form lipid hydroperoxides (Valentao et al., 2002).This can lead to production of alkoxy and peroxy radicals causing DNA damage (Reimersma et al., 2000) Table:-4 gives data regarding Inhibition of lipid peroxidation which was significant with all plant extracts.

Table 1: DPPH radical scavenging activity with different concentration of ethanolic Extract Comparison of IC50 with standard BHT (1mg/ml).The values are expressed as scavenging %. BHT shown 74.8% inhibition.

                        Total  antioxidant activity (DPPH radical % scavenging activity)
                                     Concentration of plant extracts in (gm/100ml)
Plant species 1 5 10 15 20
N.jatamansi(root) 23.5+0.270

 

34.6+0.129

 

60.6+0.571

 

63.4+0.282

 

68.7+0.216

 

S.chirayita(stem) 11.2+0.208 15.1+0.535

 

24.9+0.369

 

28.6+0.489

 

41.4+1.104

 

G.glabra(roots)

 

13.4+0.451

 

32.3+0.294

 

50.3+0.251

 

64.8+0.673

 

68.6+0.707

 

Z.officinale (root) 10.8+0.129

 

21.8+0.163

 

31.4+0.621

 

37.6+0.683

 

39.5+0.778

 

C.carvi(seeds) 10.8+0.115 19.2+0.294

 

22.1+1.798

 

29+0.613

 

38.6+0.976

 

T.ammi(fruits) 19.2+0.535

 

41.7+0.355

 

63.8+1.961

 

67.8+0.163

 

75.1+0.244

 

M. indica(fruits) 16.9+0.182

 

24.6+0.163

 

33+0.294

 

38.7+0.141

 

69.4+0.941

 

B. aristata(root) 87.8+0.621 91.8+0.100 92.8+0.163

 

93+0.208

 

95.9+0.378

 

F.vulgare(seeds) 10.2+0.864

 

14.3+0.294

 

21+0.331

 

23.2+0.141

 

34.2+0.216
M.fragans(seeds) 26.5+0.14 74.4+0.346

 

87+0.163

 

90.4+0.420

 

91.8+0.238

 

Table 2: Superoxide radical scavenging activity of ethanolic plant extract .Comparison of IC50 with standard BHT (1mg/ml), with 69.4% of inhibition 

                  Total antioxidant activity (superoxide radical scavenging activity %)
                                     Concentration of plant extracts in (gm/100ml)
Plant species 1 5 10 15 20
N.jatamansi(root) 80.5+0.804 81.8+0.516

 

86.3+0.244

 

87.6+0.627

 

88.3+0.238

 

S.chirayita(stem) 58+0.288

 

58.8+0.559

 

69.7+1.416

 

70+0.901

 

81.9+1.515

 

G.glabra(roots) 63+0.714 65.1+0.697

 

67+1.084

 

78+1.322

 

83.2+3.456

 

Z.officinale (roots) 58.8+0.282

 

62.4+1.382 67.4+1.392

 

71+0.993

 

75.6+1.886

 

C.carvi(seeds) 67+1.157

 

70.2+0.953

 

74+1.447

 

77.1+1.842

 

82.5+0.387
T.ammi(fruits) 34+1.920 38.2+1.271

 

62.8+2.127

 

76.5+0.716

 

83.5+2.525

 

M. indica(fruits) 74+1.201 79.3+0.758

 

80.1+0.300

 

82.5+1.160

 

83+1.00

 

B. aristata(root) 82.7+0.057

 

83.5+0.331

 

85+2.060

 

89+0.450

 

92+0.704

 

F.vulgare(seeds) 59+1.223

 

63.8+1.650

 

66.4+1.195

 

70+0.704

 

73+0.732

 

M.fragans(seeds) 78.6+1.212

 

81.3+0.443

 

83.2+0.345

 

85+1.332

 

88+0.911

 

Table 3: Gives IC50 value which is   concentration dependent and compared with BHT (1mg/ml) standard which exhibited 71% scavenging activity .

                               Total antioxidant activity (hydroxyl radical scavenging activity%)
                                      Concentration of plant extracts in (gm/100ml)
  Plants species 1 5 10 15 20
N.jatamansi(root) 60.4+2.219

 

70.5+1.212

 

77.8+2.737

 

80+0.818

 

83+1.388

 

S. chirayita(stem) 56.3+8.9

 

60.4+4.830

 

62.9+1.512

 

64.3+1.247

 

71.2+1.160
G.glabra(roots) 55+1.07 60.9+1.122

 

62.6+3.746

 

63+1.414

 

66+1.214

 

Z.officinale (roots) 55.2+1.258

 

59+1.474

 

61+1.814

 

64+1.453

 

69+1.247

 

C.carvi(seeds) 39+2.606

 

41.2+2.29

 

46.4+0.663

 

47.2+1.402

 

49+1.390
T.ammi(fruits) 58+3.23 56+1.164

 

54.6+0.896

 

60.1+1.512

 

60.4+0.568

 

M. indica(fruits) 56.5+2.11

 

68.3+0.743

 

71.5+2.273

 

72+1.694

 

76.2+0.848

 

B. aristata(root) 71.6+2.129

 

83+1.388

 

93.6+0.945

 

96.5+1.298

 

97+0.816

 

F.vulgare(seeds) 51.4+4.867

 

59+1.388

 

61.5+0.894

 

66+1.515

 

72.3+0.943

 

M.fragans(seeds) 70.5+2.124

 

78.1+2.843

 

82.2+1.357

 

86.6+1.248

 

89.9+1.555

 

Table 4: In vitro lipid peroxidation of ethanolic extract in comparison with standard BHT (1mg/ml) 79.3% of inhibition.

           Total antioxidant activity (invitro lipid peroxidation scavenging activity %)
                                      Concentration of plant extracts in (gm/100ml)
  Plants species 1 5 10 15 20
N.jatamansi(roots) 84.2+0.572 88.5+0.529

 

93.5+0.920

 

94.4+0.420

 

96.3+0.454

 

S. chirayita(stem) 85.6+1.351

 

87+0.529

 

90.8+0.840

 

92.6+0.288

 

94.9+0.141

 

G.glabra(roots) 82.6+0.476

 

88+0.051

 

92.3+0.244

 

93.3+0.848

 

96.3+0.270

 

Z.officinale (roots) 85.4+0.420

 

89.6+0.282

 

92.3+0.820

 

93.8+0.624

 

95.9+0.476

 

C.carvi(seeds) 80.3+0.3

 

84+0.387

 

90.3+0.496

 

92.7+0.979

 

93.5+0.369

 

T.ammi(fruits) 70.5+0.5

 

87.8+0.238

 

91.7+0.559

 

92.5+0.412

 

94.1+0.141

 

M. indica(fruits) 70.5+0.5

 

87.8+0.238

 

91.7+0.559

 

92.5+0.412

 

94.1+0.141

 

B. aristata(root) 90+0.05

 

92+0.932

 

93.5+0.5

 

97.5+0.705

 

98+0.052

 

F.vulgare(seeds) 86.5+0.288

 

90+0.387

 

94.5+0.605

 

95+0.05

 

97.7+0.270

 

M.fragans(seeds) 61.4+0.516

 

89+0.866

 

92+0.05

 

94.6+0.420

 

96.3+1.852

 

Table 5: Total antioxidants activity by FRAP method with different concentration of ethanolic extract (concentration in mM).

Total antioxidant activity (ferric chloride reducing ability of plasma concentration in mM.)
                                      Concentration of plant extracts in (gm/100ml)
  Plants species 1 5 10 15 20
N.jatamansi(root) 0.116+0.008

 

0.25+0.005

 

0.49+0.005

 

0.49+0.005

 

0.58+0.005

 

S. chirayita(stem) 0.07+0.008

 

0.11+0.005

 

0.19+0.008

 

0.20+0.005

 

0.22+0.093

 

G.glabra(roots) 0.118+0.002

 

0.26+0.008

 

0.49+0.005

 

0.52+0.005

 

0.62+0.014

 

Z.officinale (roots) 0.90+0.003

 

0.11+0.005

 

0.28+0.008

 

0.13+0.008

 

0.16+0.008

 

C.carvi(seeds) 0.08+0.001 0.10+0.008

 

0.13+0.005

 

0.18+0.005

 

0.25+0.01

 

T.ammi(fruits) 0.10+0.005

 

0.22+0.005

 

0.48+0.012

 

0.89+0.020

 

2.7+0.05

 

M. indica(fruits) 0.13+0.005

 

0.17+0.008

 

0.25+0.012

 

1.0 +0.042

 

2.3+0.05

 

B. aristata(root) 0.93+0.005

 

1.9+0.001

 

5.0 +0.08

 

8.9+0.14

 

10.7+0.20

 

F.vulgare(seeds) 0.03+0.008

 

0.06+0.008

 

0.07+0.012

 

0.13+0.005

 

0.15+0.005
M.fragans(seeds) 0.18+0.001

 

0.66+0.012

 

0.8+0.001

 

2.1+0.05

 

2.6+0.346

 

Table 6: Qualitative phytochemical analyses for the presence of alkaloids, Flavonoids and Phenolics.

                    Bioactive compounds
  Plants species       Alkaloids

 

Flavonoids

 

Phenolics

 

N.jatamansi(root) + + +
S.chirayita(stem) + + +
G.glabra(roots) + +
Z.officinale(roots) + +
C.carvi(seeds) +
T.ammi(fruits) +
M. indica(fruits) +
B. aristata(root) + + +
F.vulgare(seeds) +
M.fragans(seeds) + + +

It has been recognized that most of the plants considered in the present study showed significant activity when compared with synthetic antioxidant like BHT among these B.aristata ,M.fragans, N.jatamansi were proved to be most promising source of antioxidant and can be used as natural future source of antioxidants .Hence studies has to done to analyze bioactive responsible for radical scavenging activity In long term study on these plant species may be valuable in treatment for free radical induced damage.

Acknowledgement

I am thankful to M.V.R.P.G college, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam management for their support to provide requirements to carry out the work, Dr. M.Ramarao for his valuable guidance.

References

  1. 1.W.C. Bray, H. A. Liebhafsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 5338–44(1931).
  2. Cerutti AA.Oxidant stress and carcinogenesis. Eur J Clin Inves 21: 1-11. (1991).
  3. 3 .Harman D. Free radical theory of aging, increasing the functional life span.  Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 717: 1-15. (1994).
  4. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. Free radical in biology and medicine, 3rd Edition. Oxford press, London Chapter 3. (1998).
  5. Finkel T, Holbrook NJ. Oxidants, Oxidative stress biology of ageing. Nature 408:239- 247.(2000)
  6. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. Cross Ce Free radicals antioxidants and human diseases: Where are we known? J Lab Clin Med 119:598-620.(1992)
  7. Knight JA .Diseases related to oxygen-derived free radicals.Ann clin Lab Sci 25:111-121.1995. (2000).
  8. Visioli F, Kearey JF, Halliwell B .Antioidants and cardiovascular diseases: panaceas or tonics for tired sheep .Cardiovasc Res 47:409.(2000)
  9. Chin-Yuan HSU, Antioxidant activity of extracts from Polygonum aviculare L..Bio Res 39: 281-288. (2006).
  10. Dalby, Andrew, “Spikenard” in Alan Davids The Oxford Companion to Food, 2nd ed. by Oxford: Oxford University Press ISBNO-19-280681-5,( 2006).
  11. Porcher, Michel H.; et al. (2004). Multilingual Multiscript Plant Name Database. Retrieved 2008-05-16.(2004).
  12. Sharma E., Sharma, R., and et al., ‘A Boon for Mountain Populations: Large(2000)
  13. Mitra, S. K., Gopumadhavan, S. and Muralidhar, T. S., Effect of D-400, an ayurvedic herbal formulation on experimentally- induced diabetes mellitus. Phytother. Res., 10, 433.(1996).
  14. Subba, J. R.,. ‘Agriculture in Hills of Sikkim’. In Sikkim Science Society. Gangtok: Sikkim Science Society.(1984).
  15. Nadkarni KM (Ed) Indian Materia Medica. 3 rd ed. Mumbai:Bombay Popular Prakashan; 8304.
  16. M.Rama Rao,I.Bhaskar reddy ,etal. Radical scavenging and antioxidant activity of ethylacetate fraction of Plectranthus aromaticus leaves. Biosciencse, Biotechnology research Asia.Vol.4 (2), 581-588(2007).
(Visited 197 times, 1 visits today)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.